CVE-2019-13945 : Detail

CVE-2019-13945

6.8
/
MEDIUM
0.06%V3
Physical
2019-12-12 12:19 +00:00
2020-07-14 11:18 +00:00

Alert for a CVE

Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Alert management

Descriptions

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family < V4.x (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family V4.x (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions with Function State (FS) < 11), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU CR20s (6ES7 288-1CR20-0AA1) (All versions <= V2.3.0 and Function State (FS) <= 3), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU CR30s (6ES7 288-1CR30-0AA1) (All versions <= V2.3.0 and Function State (FS) <= 3), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU CR40 (6ES7 288-1CR40-0AA0) (All versions <= V2.2.2 and Function State (FS) <= 8), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU CR40s (6ES7 288-1CR40-0AA1) (All versions <= V2.3.0 and Function State (FS) <= 3), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU CR60 (6ES7 288-1CR60-0AA0) (All versions <= V2.2.2 and Function State (FS) <= 10), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU CR60s (6ES7 288-1CR60-0AA1) (All versions <= V2.3.0 and Function State (FS) <= 3), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU SR20 (6ES7 288-1SR20-0AA0) (All versions <= V2.5.0 and Function State (FS) <= 11), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU SR30 (6ES7 288-1SR30-0AA0) (All versions <= V2.5.0 and Function State (FS) <= 10), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU SR40 (6ES7 288-1SR40-0AA0) (All versions <= V2.5.0 and Function State (FS) <= 10), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU SR60 (6ES7 288-1SR60-0AA0) (All versions <= V2.5.0 and Function State (FS) <= 12), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU ST20 (6ES7 288-1ST20-0AA0) (All versions <= V2.5.0 and Function State (FS) <= 9), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU ST30 (6ES7 288-1ST30-0AA0) (All versions <= V2.5.0 and Function State (FS) <= 9), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU ST40 (6ES7 288-1ST40-0AA0) (All versions <= V2.5.0 and Function State (FS) <= 8), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU ST60 (6ES7 288-1ST60-0AA0) (All versions <= V2.5.0 and Function State (FS) <= 8), SIMATIC S7-200 SMART CPU family (All versions). There is an access mode used during manufacturing of the affected devices that allows additional diagnostic functionality. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker with physical access to the UART interface during boot process.

Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE-749 Exposed Dangerous Method or Function
The product provides an Applications Programming Interface (API) or similar interface for interaction with external actors, but the interface includes a dangerous method or function that is not properly restricted.

Metrics

Metric Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V3.1 6.8 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Physical

The attack requires the attacker to physically touch or manipulate the vulnerable component. Physical interaction may be brief (e.g., evil maid attack1) or persistent. An example of such an attack is a cold boot attack in which an attacker gains access to disk encryption keys after physically accessing the target system. Other examples include peripheral attacks via FireWire/USB Direct Memory Access (DMA).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

None

The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

High

There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

nvd@nist.gov
V2 4.6 AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-1200_firmware >> Version *

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-1200 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>S7-200_smart_firmware >> Version *

Siemens>>S7-200_smart >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_st20_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.5.0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_st20 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_st30_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.5.0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_st30 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_st40_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.5.0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_st40 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_st60_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.5.0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_st60 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_sr20_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.5.0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_sr20 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_sr30_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.5.0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_sr30 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_sr40_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.5.0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_sr40 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_sr60_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.5.0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_sr60 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_cr40_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.2.2

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_cr40 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_cr60_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.2.2

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_cr60 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_cr20s_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.3.0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_cr20s >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_cr30s_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.3.0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_cr30s >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_cr40s_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.3.0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_cr40s >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_cr60s_firmware >> Version To (including) 2.3.0

Siemens>>Simatic_s7-200_smart_cpu_cr60s >> Version -

References

Click on the button to the left (OFF), to authorize the inscription of cookie improving the functionalities of the site. Click on the button to the left (Accept all), to unauthorize the inscription of cookie improving the functionalities of the site.