CVE-2024-36907 : Detail

CVE-2024-36907

5.5
/
Medium
Memory Corruption
0.04%V3
Local
2024-05-30
15h29 +00:00
2024-12-19
09h01 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

SUNRPC: add a missing rpc_stat for TCP TLS

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: SUNRPC: add a missing rpc_stat for TCP TLS Commit 1548036ef120 ("nfs: make the rpc_stat per net namespace") added functionality to specify rpc_stats function but missed adding it to the TCP TLS functionality. As the result, mounting with xprtsec=tls lead to the following kernel oops. [ 128.984192] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000000000000001c [ 128.985058] Mem abort info: [ 128.985372] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ 128.985709] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 128.986176] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 128.986521] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 128.986804] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 128.987229] Data abort info: [ 128.987597] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 128.988169] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 128.988811] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 128.989302] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000106c84000 [ 128.990048] [000000000000001c] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 128.990736] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] SMP [ 128.991168] Modules linked in: nfs_layout_nfsv41_files rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs lockd grace netfs uinput dm_mod nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 rfkill ip_set nf_tables nfnetlink qrtr vsock_loopback vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock sunrpc vfat fat uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops uvc videobuf2_v4l2 videodev videobuf2_common mc vmw_vmci xfs libcrc32c e1000e crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce vmwgfx nvme sha256_arm64 nvme_core sr_mod cdrom sha1_ce drm_ttm_helper ttm drm_kms_helper drm sg fuse [ 128.996466] CPU: 0 PID: 179 Comm: kworker/u4:26 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.8.0-rc6+ #12 [ 128.997226] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware20,1/VBSA, BIOS VMW201.00V.21805430.BA64.2305221830 05/22/2023 [ 128.998084] Workqueue: xprtiod xs_tcp_tls_setup_socket [sunrpc] [ 128.998701] pstate: 81400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 128.999384] pc : call_start+0x74/0x138 [sunrpc] [ 128.999809] lr : __rpc_execute+0xb8/0x3e0 [sunrpc] [ 129.000244] sp : ffff8000832b3a00 [ 129.000508] x29: ffff8000832b3a00 x28: ffff800081ac79c0 x27: ffff800081ac7000 [ 129.001111] x26: 0000000004248060 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff800081596008 [ 129.001757] x23: ffff80007b087240 x22: ffff00009a509d30 x21: 0000000000000000 [ 129.002345] x20: ffff000090075600 x19: ffff00009a509d00 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 129.002912] x17: 733d4d4554535953 x16: 42555300312d746e x15: ffff8000832b3a88 [ 129.003464] x14: ffffffffffffffff x13: ffff8000832b3a7d x12: 0000000000000008 [ 129.004021] x11: 0101010101010101 x10: ffff8000150cb560 x9 : ffff80007b087c00 [ 129.004577] x8 : ffff00009a509de0 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 00000000be8c4ee3 [ 129.005026] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff000094d56680 [ 129.005425] x2 : ffff80007b0637f8 x1 : ffff000090075600 x0 : ffff00009a509d00 [ 129.005824] Call trace: [ 129.005967] call_start+0x74/0x138 [sunrpc] [ 129.006233] __rpc_execute+0xb8/0x3e0 [sunrpc] [ 129.006506] rpc_execute+0x160/0x1d8 [sunrpc] [ 129.006778] rpc_run_task+0x148/0x1f8 [sunrpc] [ 129.007204] tls_probe+0x80/0xd0 [sunrpc] [ 129.007460] rpc_ping+0x28/0x80 [sunrpc] [ 129.007715] rpc_create_xprt+0x134/0x1a0 [sunrpc] [ 129.007999] rpc_create+0x128/0x2a0 [sunrpc] [ 129.008264] xs_tcp_tls_setup_socket+0xdc/0x508 [sunrpc] [ 129.008583] process_one_work+0x174/0x3c8 [ 129.008813] worker_thread+0x2c8/0x3e0 [ 129.009033] kthread+0x100/0x110 [ 129.009225] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 129.009432] Code: f0ffffc2 911fe042 aa1403e1 aa1303e0 (b9401c83)

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereference
The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V3.1 5.5 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
EPSS First.org

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version To (excluding) 5.4.276

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 5.5 To (excluding) 5.10.217

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 5.11 To (excluding) 5.15.159

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 5.16 To (excluding) 6.1.91

References