CVE-2024-49932 : Detail

CVE-2024-49932

5.5
/
Medium
0.04%V3
Local
2024-10-21
18h01 +00:00
2024-12-19
09h29 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST On relocation we're doing readahead on the relocation inode, but if the filesystem is backed by a RAID stripe tree we can get ENOENT (e.g. due to preallocated extents not being mapped in the RST) from the lookup. But readahead doesn't handle the error and submits invalid reads to the device, causing an assertion in the scatter-gather list code: BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): balance: start -d -m -s BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): relocating block group 6480920576 flags data|raid0 BTRFS error (device nvme1n1): cannot find raid-stripe for logical [6481928192, 6481969152] devid 2, profile raid0 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:115! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 1012 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #567 RIP: 0010:__blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001a43820 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffea00045d4802 RDX: 0000000117520000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881027d1000 RBP: 0000000000003000 R08: ffffea00045d4902 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff8881003d10b8 R13: ffffc90001a438f0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000003000 FS: 00007fcc048a6900(0000) GS:ffff88813bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000002cd11000 CR3: 00000001109ea001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0 Call Trace: ? __die_body.cold+0x14/0x25 ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 ? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80 ? __blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 ? __blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? __blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0 nvme_prep_rq.part.0+0x9d/0x770 nvme_queue_rq+0x7d/0x1e0 __blk_mq_issue_directly+0x2a/0x90 ? blk_mq_get_budget_and_tag+0x61/0x90 blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly+0x56/0xf0 blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0x52b/0x5d0 __blk_flush_plug+0xc6/0x110 blk_finish_plug+0x28/0x40 read_pages+0x160/0x1c0 page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x109/0x180 relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x611/0x6a0 ? btrfs_search_slot+0xba4/0xd20 ? balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags+0x26/0xb00 relocate_data_extent.constprop.0+0x134/0x160 relocate_block_group+0x3f2/0x500 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x250/0x430 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x3f/0x130 btrfs_balance+0x71b/0xef0 ? kmalloc_trace_noprof+0x13b/0x280 btrfs_ioctl+0x2c2e/0x3030 ? kvfree_call_rcu+0x1e6/0x340 ? list_lru_add_obj+0x66/0x80 ? mntput_no_expire+0x3a/0x220 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x96/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x54/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7fcc04514f9b Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7fcc04514f71. RSP: 002b:00007ffeba923370 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fcc04514f9b RDX: 00007ffeba923460 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000013 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 00007fcc043fbba8 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffeba924fc5 R13: 00007ffeba923460 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 00000000004d4bb0 Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- RIP: 0010:__blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001a43820 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffea00045d4802 RDX: 0000000117520000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881027d1000 RBP: 0000000000003000 R08: ffffea00045d4902 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff8881003d10b8 R13: ffffc90001a438f0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000003000 FS: 00007fcc048a6900(0000) GS:ffff88813bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fcc04514f71 CR3: 00000001109ea001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0 Kernel p ---truncated---

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE-617 Reachable Assertion
The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V3.1 5.5 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
EPSS First.org

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version To (excluding) 6.11.3

References