CVE-2024-50037 : Detail

CVE-2024-50037

5.5
/
Medium
0.04%V3
Local
2024-10-21
19h39 +00:00
2024-12-19
09h31 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

drm/fbdev-dma: Only cleanup deferred I/O if necessary

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/fbdev-dma: Only cleanup deferred I/O if necessary Commit 5a498d4d06d6 ("drm/fbdev-dma: Only install deferred I/O if necessary") initializes deferred I/O only if it is used. drm_fbdev_dma_fb_destroy() however calls fb_deferred_io_cleanup() unconditionally with struct fb_info.fbdefio == NULL. KASAN with the out-of-tree Apple silicon display driver posts following warning from __flush_work() of a random struct work_struct instead of the expected NULL pointer derefs. [ 22.053799] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 22.054832] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at kernel/workqueue.c:4177 __flush_work+0x4d8/0x580 [ 22.056597] Modules linked in: uhid bnep uinput nls_ascii ip6_tables ip_tables i2c_dev loop fuse dm_multipath nfnetlink zram hid_magicmouse btrfs xor xor_neon brcmfmac_wcc raid6_pq hci_bcm4377 bluetooth brcmfmac hid_apple brcmutil nvmem_spmi_mfd simple_mfd_spmi dockchannel_hid cfg80211 joydev regmap_spmi nvme_apple ecdh_generic ecc macsmc_hid rfkill dwc3 appledrm snd_soc_macaudio macsmc_power nvme_core apple_isp phy_apple_atc apple_sart apple_rtkit_helper apple_dockchannel tps6598x macsmc_hwmon snd_soc_cs42l84 videobuf2_v4l2 spmi_apple_controller nvmem_apple_efuses videobuf2_dma_sg apple_z2 videobuf2_memops spi_nor panel_summit videobuf2_common asahi videodev pwm_apple apple_dcp snd_soc_apple_mca apple_admac spi_apple clk_apple_nco i2c_pasemi_platform snd_pcm_dmaengine mc i2c_pasemi_core mux_core ofpart adpdrm drm_dma_helper apple_dart apple_soc_cpufreq leds_pwm phram [ 22.073768] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted 6.11.2-asahi+ #asahi-dev [ 22.075612] Hardware name: Apple MacBook Pro (13-inch, M2, 2022) (DT) [ 22.077032] pstate: 01400005 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 22.078567] pc : __flush_work+0x4d8/0x580 [ 22.079471] lr : __flush_work+0x54/0x580 [ 22.080345] sp : ffffc000836ef820 [ 22.081089] x29: ffffc000836ef880 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff80002ddb7128 [ 22.082678] x26: dfffc00000000000 x25: 1ffff000096f0c57 x24: ffffc00082d3e358 [ 22.084263] x23: ffff80004b7862b8 x22: dfffc00000000000 x21: ffff80005aa1d470 [ 22.085855] x20: ffff80004b786000 x19: ffff80004b7862a0 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 22.087439] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000005 [ 22.089030] x14: 1ffff800106ddf0a x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 22.090618] x11: ffffb800106ddf0f x10: dfffc00000000000 x9 : 1ffff800106ddf0e [ 22.092206] x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa x6 : 0000000000000001 [ 22.093790] x5 : ffffc000836ef728 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000020 [ 22.095368] x2 : 0000000000000008 x1 : 00000000000000aa x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 22.096955] Call trace: [ 22.097505] __flush_work+0x4d8/0x580 [ 22.098330] flush_delayed_work+0x80/0xb8 [ 22.099231] fb_deferred_io_cleanup+0x3c/0x130 [ 22.100217] drm_fbdev_dma_fb_destroy+0x6c/0xe0 [drm_dma_helper] [ 22.101559] unregister_framebuffer+0x210/0x2f0 [ 22.102575] drm_fb_helper_unregister_info+0x48/0x60 [ 22.103683] drm_fbdev_dma_client_unregister+0x4c/0x80 [drm_dma_helper] [ 22.105147] drm_client_dev_unregister+0x1cc/0x230 [ 22.106217] drm_dev_unregister+0x58/0x570 [ 22.107125] apple_drm_unbind+0x50/0x98 [appledrm] [ 22.108199] component_del+0x1f8/0x3a8 [ 22.109042] dcp_platform_shutdown+0x24/0x38 [apple_dcp] [ 22.110357] platform_shutdown+0x70/0x90 [ 22.111219] device_shutdown+0x368/0x4d8 [ 22.112095] kernel_restart+0x6c/0x1d0 [ 22.112946] __arm64_sys_reboot+0x1c8/0x328 [ 22.113868] invoke_syscall+0x78/0x1a8 [ 22.114703] do_el0_svc+0x124/0x1a0 [ 22.115498] el0_svc+0x3c/0xe0 [ 22.116181] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x70/0xc0 [ 22.117110] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x198 [ 22.117931] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE Other No informations.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V3.1 5.5 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 [email protected]

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
EPSS First.org

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 6.11 To (excluding) 6.11.4

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version 6.12

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version 6.12

References