0b 48 83 c4 08 5b 5d 41 5c c3 cc cc cc cc 48 ba 00 00 00 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffff888131eff038 EFLAGS: 00010207 RAX: ffffc90000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff888e33b80000 RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffff888e33bc29c0 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff8881598a8000 R09: ffff888e2ccedc10 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffb3367634 R12: 00000000fe000000 R13: ffff888101d0da28 R14: ffffffffc2e437e0 R15: ffff888110b03b28 FS: 00007f3c1d4b3980(0000) GS:ffff888e33b80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005651cfc93578 CR3: 0000000124e4c002 CR4: 0000000000f70ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: ? __warn.cold+0xb6/0x176 ? iounmap+0x58/0x1f0 ? report_bug+0x1f4/0x2b0 ? handle_bug+0x58/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x40 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? iounmap+0x58/0x1f0 pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc+0x477/0x6c0 [intel_pmc_core] ? __pfx_pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc+0x10/0x10 [intel_pmc_core] ? __pfx_do_pci_enable_device+0x10/0x10 ? pci_wait_for_pending+0x60/0x110 ? pci_enable_device_flags+0x1e3/0x2e0 ? __pfx_mtl_core_init+0x10/0x10 [intel_pmc_core] pmc_core_ssram_init+0x7f/0x110 [intel_pmc_core] mtl_core_init+0xda/0x130 [intel_pmc_core] ? __mutex_init+0xb9/0x130 pmc_core_probe+0x27e/0x10b0 [intel_pmc_core] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x96/0xf0 ? __pfx_pmc_core_probe+0x10/0x10 [intel_pmc_core] ? __pfx_mutex_unlock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 ? device_pm_check_callbacks+0x82/0x370 ? acpi_dev_pm_attach+0x234/0x2b0 platform_probe+0x9f/0x150 really_probe+0x1e0/0x8a0 __driver_probe_device+0x18c/0x370 ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 driver_probe_device+0x4a/0x120 __driver_attach+0x190/0x4a0 ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 bus_for_each_dev+0x103/0x180 ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 ? klist_add_tail+0x136/0x270 bus_add_driver+0x2fc/0x540 driver_register+0x1a5/0x360 ? __pfx_pmc_core_driver_init+0x10/0x10 [intel_pmc_core] do_one_initcall+0xa4/0x380 ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 ? kasan_unpoison+0x44/0x70 do_init_module+0x296/0x800 load_module+0x5090/0x6ce0 ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 ? ima_post_read_file+0x193/0x200 ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 ? rw_verify_area+0x152/0x4c0 ? kernel_read_file+0x257/0x750 ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_filemap_get_read_batch+0x10/0x10 ? init_module_from_file+0xd1/0x130 init_module_from_file+0xd1/0x130 ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0 ---truncated---">

CVE-2024-50107 : Detail

CVE-2024-50107

5.5
/
Medium
0.04%V3
Local
2024-11-05
17h10 +00:00
2024-12-19
09h33 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

platform/x86/intel/pmc: Fix pmc_core_iounmap to call iounmap for valid addresses

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: platform/x86/intel/pmc: Fix pmc_core_iounmap to call iounmap for valid addresses Commit 50c6dbdfd16e ("x86/ioremap: Improve iounmap() address range checks") introduces a WARN when adrress ranges of iounmap are invalid. On Thinkpad P1 Gen 7 (Meteor Lake-P) this caused the following warning to appear: WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 713 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:461 iounmap+0x58/0x1f0 Modules linked in: rfkill(+) snd_timer(+) fjes(+) snd soundcore intel_pmc_core(+) int3403_thermal(+) int340x_thermal_zone intel_vsec pmt_telemetry acpi_pad pmt_class acpi_tad int3400_thermal acpi_thermal_rel joydev loop nfnetlink zram xe drm_suballoc_helper nouveau i915 mxm_wmi drm_ttm_helper gpu_sched drm_gpuvm drm_exec drm_buddy i2c_algo_bit crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ttm crc32c_intel polyval_clmulni rtsx_pci_sdmmc ucsi_acpi polyval_generic mmc_core hid_multitouch drm_display_helper ghash_clmulni_intel typec_ucsi nvme sha512_ssse3 video sha256_ssse3 nvme_core intel_vpu sha1_ssse3 rtsx_pci cec typec nvme_auth i2c_hid_acpi i2c_hid wmi pinctrl_meteorlake serio_raw ip6_tables ip_tables fuse CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 713 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2iounmap+ #42 Hardware name: LENOVO 21KWCTO1WW/21KWCTO1WW, BIOS N48ET19W (1.06 ) 07/18/2024 RIP: 0010:iounmap+0x58/0x1f0 Code: 85 6a 01 00 00 48 8b 05 e6 e2 28 04 48 39 c5 72 19 eb 26 cc cc cc 48 ba 00 00 00 00 00 00 32 00 48 8d 44 02 ff 48 39 c5 72 23 <0f> 0b 48 83 c4 08 5b 5d 41 5c c3 cc cc cc cc 48 ba 00 00 00 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffff888131eff038 EFLAGS: 00010207 RAX: ffffc90000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff888e33b80000 RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffff888e33bc29c0 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff8881598a8000 R09: ffff888e2ccedc10 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffb3367634 R12: 00000000fe000000 R13: ffff888101d0da28 R14: ffffffffc2e437e0 R15: ffff888110b03b28 FS: 00007f3c1d4b3980(0000) GS:ffff888e33b80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005651cfc93578 CR3: 0000000124e4c002 CR4: 0000000000f70ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: ? __warn.cold+0xb6/0x176 ? iounmap+0x58/0x1f0 ? report_bug+0x1f4/0x2b0 ? handle_bug+0x58/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x40 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? iounmap+0x58/0x1f0 pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc+0x477/0x6c0 [intel_pmc_core] ? __pfx_pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc+0x10/0x10 [intel_pmc_core] ? __pfx_do_pci_enable_device+0x10/0x10 ? pci_wait_for_pending+0x60/0x110 ? pci_enable_device_flags+0x1e3/0x2e0 ? __pfx_mtl_core_init+0x10/0x10 [intel_pmc_core] pmc_core_ssram_init+0x7f/0x110 [intel_pmc_core] mtl_core_init+0xda/0x130 [intel_pmc_core] ? __mutex_init+0xb9/0x130 pmc_core_probe+0x27e/0x10b0 [intel_pmc_core] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x96/0xf0 ? __pfx_pmc_core_probe+0x10/0x10 [intel_pmc_core] ? __pfx_mutex_unlock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 ? device_pm_check_callbacks+0x82/0x370 ? acpi_dev_pm_attach+0x234/0x2b0 platform_probe+0x9f/0x150 really_probe+0x1e0/0x8a0 __driver_probe_device+0x18c/0x370 ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 driver_probe_device+0x4a/0x120 __driver_attach+0x190/0x4a0 ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 bus_for_each_dev+0x103/0x180 ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 ? klist_add_tail+0x136/0x270 bus_add_driver+0x2fc/0x540 driver_register+0x1a5/0x360 ? __pfx_pmc_core_driver_init+0x10/0x10 [intel_pmc_core] do_one_initcall+0xa4/0x380 ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 ? kasan_unpoison+0x44/0x70 do_init_module+0x296/0x800 load_module+0x5090/0x6ce0 ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 ? ima_post_read_file+0x193/0x200 ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 ? rw_verify_area+0x152/0x4c0 ? kernel_read_file+0x257/0x750 ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_filemap_get_read_batch+0x10/0x10 ? init_module_from_file+0xd1/0x130 init_module_from_file+0xd1/0x130 ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0 ---truncated---

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE Other No informations.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V3.1 5.5 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Local

The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities.

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

None

There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

High

There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2
EPSS V3
0.040.040.030.030.020.020.020.020.010.010.000.000.04%0.04%0.04%15 Nov15 NovDec '24Dec '2415 Dec15 DecJan '25Jan '2515 Jan15 JanFeb '25Feb '25
Download SVG
Download PNG
Download CSV

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
12.712.712.012.011.311.310.710.710.010.010%11%12%15 Nov15 NovDec '24Dec '2415 Dec15 DecJan '25Jan '2515 Jan15 JanFeb '25Feb '25
Download SVG
Download PNG
Download CSV
EPSS First.org

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version From (including) 6.8 To (excluding) 6.11.6

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version 6.12

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version 6.12

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version 6.12

Linux>>Linux_kernel >> Version 6.12

References