CVE-2024-50560 : Detail

CVE-2024-50560

2.3
/
Low
A03-Injection
0.05%V3
Network
2024-11-12
12h50 +00:00
2025-02-11
10h28 +00:00
CVE.org
NVD
Notifications for a CVE
Stay informed of any changes for a specific CVE.
Notifications manage

CVE Descriptions

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU (6GK6108-4AM00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2), RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAM (6GK6108-4AM00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M804PB (6GK5804-0AP00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router (6GK5812-1AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router (6GK5812-1BA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router (6GK5816-1AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router (6GK5816-1BA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-Router (6GK5826-2AB00-2AB2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M874-2 (6GK5874-2AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M874-3 (6GK5874-3AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M874-3 3G-Router (CN) (6GK5874-3AA00-2FA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M876-3 (6GK5876-3AA02-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M876-3 (ROK) (6GK5876-3AA02-2EA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M876-4 (6GK5876-4AA10-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M876-4 (EU) (6GK5876-4AA00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M876-4 (NAM) (6GK5876-4AA00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (A1) (6GK5853-2EA10-2AA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (B1) (6GK5853-2EA10-2BA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (EU) (6GK5853-2EA00-2DA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (A1) (6GK5856-2EA10-3AA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (B1) (6GK5856-2EA10-3BA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (CN) (6GK5856-2EA00-3FA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (EU) (6GK5856-2EA00-3DA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (RoW) (6GK5856-2EA00-3AA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE S615 EEC LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA01-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE S615 LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE WAB762-1 (6GK5762-1AJ00-6AA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-7DA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (ME) (6GK5763-1AL00-7DC0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (US) (6GK5763-1AL00-7DB0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (6GK5766-1GE00-7DA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (ME) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DC0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DB0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (6GK5766-1GE00-7TA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (ME) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TC0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TB0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUB762-1 (6GK5762-1AJ00-1AA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUB762-1 iFeatures (6GK5762-1AJ00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3AA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3DA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (US) (6GK5763-1AL00-3AB0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (US) (6GK5763-1AL00-3DB0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (6GK5766-1GE00-3DA0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (ME) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DC0) (All versions < V3.0.0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (USA) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DB0) (All versions < V3.0.0). Affected devices truncates usernames longer than 15 characters when accessed via SSH or Telnet. This could allow an attacker to compromise system integrity.

CVE Informations

Related Weaknesses

CWE-ID Weakness Name Source
CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
CWE Other No informations.

Metrics

Metrics Score Severity CVSS Vector Source
V4.0 2.3 LOW CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the “thing that is vulnerable”, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable system.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit.

High

The successful attack depends on the evasion or circumvention of security-enhancing techniques in place that would otherwise hinder the attack. These include: Evasion of exploit mitigation techniques. The attacker must have additional methods available to bypass security measures in place. For example, circumvention of address space randomization (ASLR) or data execution prevention (DEP) must be performed for the attack to be successful. Obtaining target-specific secrets. The attacker must gather some target-specific secret before the attack can be successful. A secret is any piece of information that cannot be obtained through any amount of reconnaissance. To obtain the secret the attacker must perform additional attacks or break otherwise secure measures (e.g. knowledge of a secret key may be needed to break a crypto channel). This operation must be performed for each attacked target.

Attack Requirements

This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack.

Present

The successful attack depends on the presence of specific deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These include: A race condition must be won to successfully exploit the vulnerability. The successfulness of the attack is conditioned on execution conditions that are not under full control of the attacker. The attack may need to be launched multiple times against a single target before being successful. Network injection. The attacker must inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim (e.g. vulnerabilities requiring an on-path attacker).

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker. Examples include: a remote attacker is able to send packets to a target system a locally authenticated attacker executes code to elevate privileges

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the system due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability.

Low

Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted system resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.

Sub Confidentiality Impact

Negligible

There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Sub Integrity Impact

None

There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Sub Availability Impact

None

There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Threat Metrics

The Threat metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability for a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the consumer analyst to customize the resulting score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of complementary/alternative security controls in place, Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability. The metrics are the modified equivalent of Base metrics and are assigned values based on the system placement within organizational infrastructure.

Supplemental Metrics

Supplemental metric group provides new metrics that describe and measure additional extrinsic attributes of a vulnerability. While the assessment of Supplemental metrics is provisioned by the provider, the usage and response plan of each metric within the Supplemental metric group is determined by the consumer.
V3.1 3.1 LOW CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

High

successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

Low

Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.
V3.1 4.3 MEDIUM CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Base: Exploitabilty Metrics

The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.

Attack Vector

This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.

Network

The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).

Attack Complexity

This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker’s control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.

Low

Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success when attacking the vulnerable component.

Privileges Required

This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.

Low

The attacker requires privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.

User Interaction

This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.

None

The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.

Base: Scope Metrics

The Scope metric captures whether a vulnerability in one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.

Scope

Formally, a security authority is a mechanism (e.g., an application, an operating system, firmware, a sandbox environment) that defines and enforces access control in terms of how certain subjects/actors (e.g., human users, processes) can access certain restricted objects/resources (e.g., files, CPU, memory) in a controlled manner. All the subjects and objects under the jurisdiction of a single security authority are considered to be under one security scope. If a vulnerability in a vulnerable component can affect a component which is in a different security scope than the vulnerable component, a Scope change occurs. Intuitively, whenever the impact of a vulnerability breaches a security/trust boundary and impacts components outside the security scope in which vulnerable component resides, a Scope change occurs.

Unchanged

An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.

Base: Impact Metrics

The Impact metrics capture the effects of a successfully exploited vulnerability on the component that suffers the worst outcome that is most directly and predictably associated with the attack. Analysts should constrain impacts to a reasonable, final outcome which they are confident an attacker is able to achieve.

Confidentiality Impact

This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.

Integrity Impact

This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.

Low

Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.

Availability Impact

This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.

None

There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Temporal Metrics

The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence in the description of a vulnerability.

Environmental Metrics

These metrics enable the analyst to customize the CVSS score depending on the importance of the affected IT asset to a user’s organization, measured in terms of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.

 nvd@nist.gov

EPSS

EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.

EPSS Score

The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.

EPSS Percentile

The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
EPSS First.org

Products Mentioned

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Ruggedcom_rm1224_lte\(4g\)_eu_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

Siemens>>Ruggedcom_rm1224_lte\(4g\)_eu >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Ruggedcom_rm1224_lte\(4g\)_nam_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

Siemens>>Ruggedcom_rm1224_lte\(4g\)_nam >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Scalance_m804pb_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

Siemens>>Scalance_m804pb >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Scalance_m812-1_\(annex_a\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

Siemens>>Scalance_m812-1_\(annex_a\) >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Scalance_m812-1_\(annex_b\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

Siemens>>Scalance_m812-1_\(annex_b\) >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Scalance_m816-1_\(annex_a\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

Siemens>>Scalance_m816-1_\(annex_a\) >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Scalance_m816-1_\(annex_b\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

Siemens>>Scalance_m816-1_\(annex_b\) >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Scalance_m826-2_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

Siemens>>Scalance_m826-2 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Scalance_m874-2_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

Siemens>>Scalance_m874-2 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Scalance_m874-3_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

Siemens>>Scalance_m874-3 >> Version -

Configuraton 0

Siemens>>Scalance_m874-3_\(cn\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

    Siemens>>Scalance_m874-3_\(cn\) >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_m876-3_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_m876-3 >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_m876-3_\(rok\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_m876-3_\(rok\) >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_m876-4_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_m876-4 >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_m876-4_\(eu\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_m876-4_\(eu\) >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_m876-4_\(nam\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_m876-4_\(nam\) >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum853-1_\(a1\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum853-1_\(a1\) >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum853-1_\(b1\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum853-1_\(b1\) >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum853-1_\(eu\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum853-1_\(eu\) >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum856-1_\(a1\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum856-1_\(a1\) >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum856-1_\(b1\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum856-1_\(b1\) >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum856-1_\(cn\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum856-1_\(cn\) >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum856-1_\(eu\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum856-1_\(eu\) >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum856-1_\(row\)_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_mum856-1_\(row\) >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_s615_eec_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_s615_eec >> Version -

      Configuraton 0

      Siemens>>Scalance_s615_firmware >> Version To (excluding) 8.2

      Siemens>>Scalance_s615 >> Version -

      References