Modes Of Introduction
Implementation
Applicable Platforms
Language
Name: C (Sometimes)
Name: C++ (Sometimes)
Common Consequences
Scope |
Impact |
Likelihood |
Confidentiality Integrity Availability | Alter Execution Logic
Note: This is a general logic error which will often lead to obviously-incorrect behaviors that are quickly noticed and fixed. In lightly tested or untested code, this error may be introduced it into a production environment and provide additional attack vectors by creating a control flow path leading to an unexpected state in the application. The consequences will depend on the types of behaviors that are being incorrectly executed. | |
Observed Examples
References |
Description |
| incorrect indentation of "goto" statement makes it more difficult to detect an incorrect goto (Apple's "goto fail") |
Potential Mitigations
Phases : Implementation
Always use explicit block delimitation and use static-analysis technologies to enforce this practice.
Detection Methods
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Effectiveness : High
Vulnerability Mapping Notes
Justification : This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Comment : Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
References
REF-18
The CLASP Application Security Process
Secure Software, Inc..
https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf
Submission
Name |
Organization |
Date |
Date release |
Version |
CLASP |
|
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
2006-07-19 +00:00 |
Draft 3 |
Modifications
Name |
Organization |
Date |
Comment |
Eric Dalci |
Cigital |
2008-07-01 +00:00 |
updated Time_of_Introduction |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2008-09-08 +00:00 |
updated Applicable_Platforms, Common_Consequences, Description, Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-05-27 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2009-10-29 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2010-06-21 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Other_Notes |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-01 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2011-06-27 +00:00 |
updated Common_Consequences |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2012-05-11 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-06-23 +00:00 |
updated Observed_Examples |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2014-07-30 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2017-11-08 +00:00 |
updated Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2019-01-03 +00:00 |
updated Weakness_Ordinalities |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2020-02-24 +00:00 |
updated References, Relationships, Type |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-04-27 +00:00 |
updated Detection_Factors, Relationships |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-06-29 +00:00 |
updated Mapping_Notes |
CWE Content Team |
MITRE |
2023-10-26 +00:00 |
updated Demonstrative_Examples |