CVE ID | Published | Description | Score | Severity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Windows ALPC Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Desktop Protocol Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows HTML Platforms Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Common Log File System Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Microsoft introduced a new feature in Windows 10 known as Cloud Clipboard which, if enabled, will record data copied to the clipboard to the cloud, and make it available on other computers in certain scenarios. Applications that wish to prevent copied data from being recorded in Cloud History must use specific clipboard formats; and Firefox before versions 94 and ESR 91.3 did not implement them. This could have caused sensitive data to be recorded to a user's Microsoft account. *This bug only affects Firefox for Windows 10+ with Cloud Clipboard enabled. Other operating systems are unaffected.*. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 94, Thunderbird < 91.3, and Firefox ESR < 91.3. | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 6.1 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Feedback Hub Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft COM for Windows Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Fast FAT File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 4.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Credential Security Support Provider Protocol (CredSSP) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Edge (Chrome based) Spoofing on IE Mode | 4.3 |
MEDIUM |
||
Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Desktop Protocol Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.4 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 4.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Desktop Bridge Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows AppX Deployment Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Console Window Host Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Fast FAT File System Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows MSHTML Platform Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft DWM Core Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows AppContainer Firewall Rules Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Desktop Bridge Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Media Audio Decoder Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows AppContainer Elevation Of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Bind Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Storage Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Redirected Drive Buffering SubSystem Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Redirected Drive Buffering SubSystem Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Microsoft Windows Update Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 5.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Key Storage Provider Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows SMB Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Redirected Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Redirected Drive Buffering SubSystem Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Subsystem for Linux Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows WLAN AutoConfig Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows WLAN AutoConfig Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Installer Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Installer Denial of Service Vulnerability | 6.1 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Authenticode Spoofing Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Bind Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | 8.1 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Media MPEG-4 Video Decoder Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows Services for NFS ONCRPC XDR Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Services for NFS ONCRPC XDR Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Services for NFS ONCRPC XDR Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Bluetooth Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows MSHTML Platform Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Graphics Component Font Parsing Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Services for NFS ONCRPC XDR Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Services for NFS ONCRPC XDR Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows Recovery Environment Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows User Account Profile Picture Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 9.9 |
CRITICAL |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. UPDATE August 10, 2021: Microsoft has completed the investigation and has released security updates to address this vulnerability. Please see the Security Updates table for the applicable update for your system. We recommend that you install these updates immediately. This security update changes the Point and Print default behavior; please see KB5005652. |
9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 6.1 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows AppX Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Container Isolation FS Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows AppContainer Elevation Of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows File History Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows MSHTML Platform Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows HTML Platforms Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
GDI+ Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Font Driver Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Assistance Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Address Book Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Kernel Memory Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.7 |
HIGH |
||
Windows GDI Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows MSHTML Platform Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Partition Management Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 6.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Certificate Spoofing Vulnerability | 8.1 |
HIGH |
||
Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows TCP/IP Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Console Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Bowser.sys Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows LSA Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows AF_UNIX Socket Provider Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Authenticode Spoofing Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Azure AD Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 8.1 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows TCP/IP Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Installer Spoofing Vulnerability | 6.2 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Media Foundation Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Desktop Bridge Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Security Account Manager Remote Protocol Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows DNS Snap-in Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows DNS Snap-in Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows DNS Snap-in Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows DNS Snap-in Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Media Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows InstallService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 6.1 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows TCP/IP Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Server for NFS Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability | 8.6 |
HIGH |
||
Server for NFS Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows GPSVC Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Server for NFS Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Event Tracing for Windows Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows HTML Platforms Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows TCP/IP Driver Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Remote Desktop Services Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Kerberos AppContainer Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows Bind Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows NTLM Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Kernel-Mode Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Container Manager Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows SMB Client Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
OLE Automation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Media Foundation Core Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows SSDP Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Projected File System FS Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Desktop Bridge Denial of Service Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.4 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Windows Infrared Data Association (IrDA) Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Microsoft Bluetooth Driver Spoofing Vulnerability | 7.1 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Container Manager Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Container Manager Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Container Manager Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Container Manager Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows CSC Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Microsoft Jet Red Database Engine and Access Connectivity Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that the A-MSDU flag in the plaintext QoS header field is authenticated. Against devices that support receiving non-SSP A-MSDU frames (which is mandatory as part of 802.11n), an adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets. | 3.5 |
LOW |
||
Windows Early Launch Antimalware Driver Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 4.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Portmapping Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.1 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Network File System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Console Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Hyper-V Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows TCP/IP Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Console Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows TCP/IP Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Installer Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Event Tracing Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Speech Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Speech Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Speech Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows DNS Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows AppX Deployment Server Denial of Service Vulnerability | 6.1 |
MEDIUM |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows DNS Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows TCP/IP Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Resource Manager PSM Service Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows GDI+ Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Microsoft Windows Codecs Library Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Media Video Decoder Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows WLAN AutoConfig Service Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 4.6 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows NTFS Denial of Service Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Application Compatibility Cache Denial of Service Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Media Video Decoder Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Early Launch Antimalware Driver Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 4.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Azure AD Web Sign-in Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows Secure Kernel Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Internet Messaging API Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Services and Controller App Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Media Photo Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Overlay Filter Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.7 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Installer Spoofing Vulnerability | 6.2 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows 10 Update Assistant Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Extensible Firmware Interface Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 6.2 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Container Execution Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Application Virtualization Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Update Stack Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows when Folder redirection has been enabled via Group Policy. When folder redirection file server is co-located with Terminal server, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability would be able to begin redirecting another user's personal data to a created folder. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker can create a new folder under the Folder Redirection root path and create a junction on a newly created User folder. When the new user logs in, Folder Redirection would start redirecting to the folder and copying personal data. This elevation of privilege vulnerability can only be addressed by reconfiguring Folder Redirection with Offline files and restricting permissions, and NOT via a security update for affected Windows Servers. See the FAQ section of this CVE for configuration guidance. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
User Profile Service Denial of Service Vulnerability | 6.1 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Media Photo Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Remote Access API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
OpenType Font Parsing Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Overlay Filter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows User Profile Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows ActiveX Installer Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Update Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.1 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Container Execution Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Virtual Registry Provider Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 8.4 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows App-V Overlay Filter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Event Tracing Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
DirectX Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Error Reporting Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Update Stack Setup Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows PKU2U Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows DirectX Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Console Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Local Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Camera Codec Pack Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows TCP/IP Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Address Book Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Mobile Device Management Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Microsoft.PowerShell.Utility Module WDAC Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Trust Verification API Denial of Service Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Microsoft Windows Codecs Library Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Backup Engine Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Fax Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Denial of Service Vulnerability | 6.8 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Remote Procedure Call Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
PFX Encryption Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability | 8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Fax Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Windows Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows GDI+ Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows LUAFV Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Edge (HTML-based) Memory Corruption Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Event Logging Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Procedure Call Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows (modem.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows InstallService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Update Stack Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows CSC Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.7 |
HIGH |
||
Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows CSC Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Multipoint Management Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows AppX Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Bluetooth Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Bluetooth Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows CryptoAPI Denial of Service Vulnerability | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Print Spooler Spoofing Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows NT Lan Manager Datagram Receiver Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Desktop Protocol Core Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Projected File System FS Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Projected File System FS Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Desktop Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft DTV-DVD Video Decoder Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Projected File System FS Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows CSC Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Fax Compose Form Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows CSC Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
TPM Device Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows CSC Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows CSC Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows CSC Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Active Template Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Runtime C++ Template Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft splwow64 Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows WLAN Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Docker Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows AppX Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Bluetooth Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 7.7 |
HIGH |
||
Windows DNS Query Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows NTFS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Digital Media Receiver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows GDI+ Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Error Reporting Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Network Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Backup Engine Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Backup Engine Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Backup Engine Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Backup Engine Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Backup Engine Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Backup Engine Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Backup Engine Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Spoofing Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Camera Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows Kernel Local Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Update Orchestrator Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Update Stack Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Update Orchestrator Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows USO Core Worker Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Delivery Optimization Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Update Orchestrator Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows NDIS Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Update Medic Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Browser Memory Corruption Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Network File System Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | 8.1 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Network File System Denial of Service Vulnerability | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | 8.1 |
HIGH |
||
Windows KernelStream Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Error Reporting Denial of Service Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Hyper-V Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows Print Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Function Discovery SSDP Provider Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Canonical Display Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows MSCTF Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Client Side Rendering Print Provider Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Remote Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Port Class Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Error Reporting Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Remote Desktop Protocol Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
DirectX Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows WalletService Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Remote Desktop Protocol Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability | 7.7 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Graphics Components handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a target system. To exploit the vulnerability, a user would have to open a specially crafted file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Graphics Components handle objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a program process a specially crafted image file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Service improperly handles file operations. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Service handles file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Service improperly handles file operations. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Service handles file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Service improperly handles file operations. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Service handles file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Service improperly handles file operations. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Service handles file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Service improperly handles file operations. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Service handles file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Camera Codec Pack improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the context of the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights. Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a user open a specially crafted file with an affected version of the Windows Camera Codec Pack. In an email attack scenario, an attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending the specially crafted file to the user and convincing the user to open the file. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a website (or leverage a compromised website that accepts or hosts user-provided content) containing a specially crafted file designed to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker would have no way to force users to visit the website. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to click a link, typically by way of an enticement in an email or instant message, and then convince them to open the specially crafted file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Camera Codec Pack handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Camera Codec Pack improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the context of the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights. Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a user open a specially crafted file with an affected version of the Windows Camera Codec Pack. In an email attack scenario, an attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending the specially crafted file to the user and convincing the user to open the file. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a website (or leverage a compromised website that accepts or hosts user-provided content) containing a specially crafted file designed to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker would have no way to force users to visit the website. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to click a link, typically by way of an enticement in an email or instant message, and then convince them to open the specially crafted file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Camera Codec Pack handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists in Microsoft Outlook software when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could cause a remote denial of service against a system. Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a specially crafted email be sent to a vulnerable Outlook server. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Outlook handles objects in memory. |
7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The vulnerability would not allow an attacker to execute code or to elevate user rights directly, but it could be used to obtain information that could be used to try to further compromise the affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Group Policy improperly checks access. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, and then run a specially crafted application to take control over the affected system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Group Policy checks access. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows User Profile Service (ProfSvc) improperly handles junction points. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could delete files and folders in an elevated context. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and delete files or folders of their choosing. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows User Profile Service handles junction points. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the .NET Framework improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could disclose contents of an affected system's memory. To exploit the vulnerability, an authenticated attacker would need to run a specially crafted application. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the .NET Framework handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles COM object creation. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run arbitrary code with elevated privileges. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows COM Server creates COM objects. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Service improperly handles file operations. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Service handles file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in Microsoft Word software when it fails to properly handle .LNK files. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could use a specially crafted file to perform actions in the security context of the current user. For example, the file could then take actions on behalf of the logged-on user with the same permissions as the current user. To exploit the vulnerability, a user must open a specially crafted file with an affected version of Microsoft Word software. In an email attack scenario, an attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending the specially crafted file to the user and convincing the user to open the file. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a website (or leverage a compromised website that accepts or hosts user-provided content) that contains a specially crafted file that is designed to exploit the vulnerability. However, an attacker would have no way to force the user to visit the website. Instead, an attacker would have to convince the user to click a link, typically by way of an enticement in an email or Instant Messenger message, and then convince the user to open the specially crafted file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Word handles these files. |
8.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a victim system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by enticing a victim to open a specially crafted file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Jet Database Engine handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) when an attacker connects to the target system using RDP and sends specially crafted requests. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could cause the RDP service on the target system to stop responding. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to run a specially crafted application against a server which provides Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) services. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how RDP handles connection requests. |
7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A spoofing vulnerability exists when Windows incorrectly validates file signatures. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass security features and load improperly signed files. In an attack scenario, an attacker could bypass security features intended to prevent improperly signed files from being loaded. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows validates file signatures. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Graphics Components handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a target system. To exploit the vulnerability, a user would have to open a specially crafted file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Graphics Components handle objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows Enterprise App Management Service improperly handles certain file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could read arbitrary files. An attacker with unprivileged access to a vulnerable system could exploit this vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows Enterprise App Management Service properly handles file operations. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Application Compatibility Client Library improperly handles registry operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated privileges. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first need code execution on a victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows Application Compatibility Client Library properly handles registry operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in Text Services Framework when it fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could potentially read data that was not intended to be disclosed. Note that this vulnerability would not allow an attacker to execute code or to elevate their user rights directly, but it could be used to obtain information that could be used to try to further compromise the affected system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and open a specially crafted file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Text Services Framework handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles COM object creation. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run arbitrary code with elevated privileges. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows COM Server creates COM objects. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface Plus (GDI+) handles objects in memory, allowing an attacker to retrieve information from a targeted system. By itself, the information disclosure does not allow arbitrary code execution; however, it could allow arbitrary code to be run if the attacker uses it in combination with another vulnerability. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how GDI+ handles memory addresses. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media Foundation handles objects in memory. |
8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Service improperly handles file operations. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Service handles file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The update addresses this vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel-mode driver handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when Microsoft Windows fails to handle file creation permissions, which could allow an attacker to create files in a protected Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) location. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker could run a specially crafted application to bypass Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) variable security in Windows. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting security feature behavior to enforce permissions. |
6.2 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles objects in the memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability:
The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way that the Windows GDI handles objects in the memory. |
8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Setup in the way it handles directories. A locally authenticated attacker could run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. After successfully exploiting the vulnerability, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring Windows Setup properly handles directories. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Error Reporting (WER) when WER handles and executes files. The vulnerability could allow elevation of privilege if an attacker can successfully exploit it. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain greater access to sensitive information and system functionality. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way that WER handles and executes files. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Error Reporting (WER) when WER handles and executes files. The vulnerability could allow elevation of privilege if an attacker can successfully exploit it. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain greater access to sensitive information and system functionality. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way that WER handles and executes files. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The update addresses this vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel-mode driver handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the Windows Installer when the Windows Installer fails to properly sanitize input leading to an insecure library loading behavior. A locally authenticated attacker could run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the input sanitization error to preclude unintended elevation. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when the Windows TCP/IP stack improperly handles ICMPv6 Router Advertisement packets. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could cause a target system to stop responding. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to send specially crafted ICMPv6 Router Advertisement packets to a remote Windows computer. The vulnerability would not allow an attacker to execute code or to elevate user rights directly. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows TCP/IP stack handles ICMPv6 Router Advertisement packets. |
7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Event System improperly handles objects in memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Event System handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when NetBIOS over TCP (NBT) Extensions (NetBT) improperly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have run a specially crafted application. The vulnerability would not allow an attacker to execute code or to elevate user rights directly, but it could be used to obtain information that could be used to try to further compromise the affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how a NetBT handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows TCP/IP stack improperly handles ICMPv6 Router Advertisement packets. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the ability to execute code on the target server or client. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to send specially crafted ICMPv6 Router Advertisement packets to a remote Windows computer. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows TCP/IP stack handles ICMPv6 Router Advertisement packets. |
8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Error Reporting manager improperly handles a process crash. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could delete a targeted file leading to an elevated status. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Error Reporting manager handles process crashes. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) when an attacker connects to the target system using RDP and sends specially crafted requests. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to run a specially crafted application against a server which provides Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) services. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how RDP handles connection requests. |
7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows kernel image handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows kernel image properly handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to take control of an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Network Connections Service handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows Network Connections Service properly handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows KernelStream improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The vulnerability would not allow an attacker to execute code or to elevate user rights directly, but it could be used to obtain information that could be used to try to further compromise the affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows KernelStream handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Storage VSP Driver improperly handles file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated privileges. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first need code execution on a victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows Storage VSP Driver properly handles file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Application Compatibility Client Library improperly handles registry operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated privileges. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first need code execution on a victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows Application Compatibility Client Library properly handles registry operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Microsoft Windows improperly handles reparse points. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could overwrite or delete a targeted file that would normally require elevated permissions. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and overwrite or delete files. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows handles reparse points. |
7.1 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Storage Services improperly handle file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated privileges. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first need code execution on a victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows Storage Services properly handle file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) service improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted script or application. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows UPnP service handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A information disclosure vulnerability exists when TLS components use weak hash algorithms. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise a users's encrypted transmission channel. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would have to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how TLS components use hash algorithms. |
5.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Media Audio Decoder improperly handles objects. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media Audio Decoder handles objects. |
8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service improperly handles file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated privileges on the victim system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, then run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service handles file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel improperly initializes objects in memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel initializes objects in memory. |
4.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The vulnerability would not allow an attacker to execute code or to elevate user rights directly, but it could be used to obtain information that could be used to try to further compromise the affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Storage Services improperly handle file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated privileges. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first need code execution on a victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows Storage Services properly handle file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows InstallService improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows InstallService handles memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Media Audio Decoder improperly handles objects. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media Audio Decoder handles objects. |
8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Wininit.dll handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability:
The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Wininit.dll properly handles objects in memory. |
8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft COM for Windows handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain elevated privileges on a targeted system. To exploit the vulnerability, a user would have to open a specially crafted file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft COM for Windows handles objects in memory. |
7.9 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Function Discovery Service handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows Function Discovery Service properly handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Microsoft Windows CloudExperienceHost fails to check COM objects. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain elevated privileges on a targeted system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted script or application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by checking COM objects. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that fdSSDP.dll handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the ssdpsrv.dll properly handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a program process a specially crafted image file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles objects in the memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability:
The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way that the Windows GDI handles objects in the memory. |
8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application on the victim system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Runtime handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when DirectX improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how DirectX handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles objects in memory. To exploit the vulnerability an attacker would have to convince a user to run a specially crafted application. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could execute arbitrary code and take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. The updates address the vulnerability by correcting how Windows handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents of its memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit an untrusted webpage. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows GDI component handles objects in memory. |
6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the win32k component improperly provides kernel information. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how win32k handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The update addresses this vulnerability by correcting how Win32k handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the ChakraCore scripting engine handles objects in memory. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how the ChakraCore scripting engine handles objects in memory. |
7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the ChakraCore scripting engine handles objects in memory. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how the ChakraCore scripting engine handles objects in memory. |
7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the StartTileData.dll handles file creation in protected locations. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the StartTileData.dll properly handles this type of function. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application on the victim system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Runtime handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Store Runtime improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Microsoft Store Runtime handles memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles calls to Win32k.sys. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain elevated privileges on a targeted system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted script or application. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows handles calls to Win32k. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector improperly handles data operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application on the victim system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector handles data operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector improperly handles file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application on the victim system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector handles file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Language Pack Installer improperly handles file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application on the victim system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Language Pack Installer handles file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a program process a specially crafted image file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. |
8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Common Log File System (CLFS) driver improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, and then run a specially crafted application to take control over the affected system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how CLFS handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when StartTileData.dll improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way in which StartTileData.dll handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents of its memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise a user’s system. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document or by convincing a user to visit an untrusted webpage. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows GDI component handles objects in memory. |
6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Shell infrastructure component improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way in which the Shell infrastructure component handles objects in memory and preventing unintended elevation from lower integrity application. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Windows Graphics Component improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way in which the Windows Graphics Component handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents of its memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise a user’s system. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document or by convincing a user to visit an untrusted webpage. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows GDI component handles objects in memory. |
6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the ChakraCore scripting engine handles objects in memory. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how the ChakraCore scripting engine handles objects in memory. |
8.1 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a victim system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by enticing a victim to open a specially crafted file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Jet Database Engine handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the ssdpsrv.dll handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the ssdpsrv.dll properly handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when DirectX improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how DirectX handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a victim system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by enticing a victim to open a specially crafted file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Jet Database Engine handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows Kernel properly handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows Routing Utilities improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could cause a target system to stop responding. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The vulnerability would not allow an attacker to execute code or to elevate user rights directly, but it could be used to cause a target system to stop responding. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Server DHCP service improperly discloses the contents of its memory. To exploit the vulnerability, an unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted packet to an affected DHCP server. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how DHCP servers initializes memory. |
7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Microsoft Windows processes group policy updates. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could potentially escalate permissions or perform additional privileged actions on the target machine. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to launch a man-in-the-middle (MiTM) attack against the traffic passing between a domain controller and the target machine. An attacker could then create a group policy to grant administrator rights to a standard user. The security update addresses the vulnerability by enforcing Kerberos authentication for certain calls over LDAP. |
8.1 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly allows arbitrary writing to the file system. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted script or application. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Print Spooler Component writes to the file system. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Wininit.dll handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability:
The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Wininit.dll properly handles objects in memory. |
8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when a Windows Projected Filesystem improperly handles file redirections. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user's system To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Projected Filesystem handle file redirections. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The vulnerability would not allow an attacker to execute code or to elevate user rights directly, but it could be used to obtain information that could be used to try to further compromise the affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Camera Codec Pack improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the context of the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights. Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a user open a specially crafted file with an affected version of the Windows Camera Codec Pack. In an email attack scenario, an attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending the specially crafted file to the user and convincing the user to open the file. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a website (or leverage a compromised website that accepts or hosts user-provided content) containing a specially crafted file designed to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker would have no way to force users to visit the website. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to click a link, typically by way of an enticement in an email or instant message, and then convince them to open the specially crafted file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Camera Codec Pack handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Graphics Component improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context. In a local attack scenario, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application to take control over the affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way in which the Microsoft Graphics Component handles objects in memory and preventing unintended elevation from user mode. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) which could allow an attacker to bypass WDAC enforcement. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could execute PowerShell commands that would be blocked by WDAC. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker need administrator access on a local machine where PowerShell is running. The attacker could then connect to a PowerShell session and send commands to execute arbitrary code. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how PowerShell commands are validated when WDAC protection is enabled. |
6.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Windows Mobile Device Management (MDM) Diagnostics improperly handles junctions. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass access restrictions to read files. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and access files. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the how Windows MDM Diagnostics handles files. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The vulnerability would not allow an attacker to execute code or to elevate user rights directly, but it could be used to obtain information that could be used to try to further compromise the affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the win32k component improperly provides kernel information. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would have to either log on locally to an affected system, or convince a locally authenticated user to execute a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how win32k handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Microsoft Graphics Component Denial of Service Vulnerability | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft COM for Windows handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a target system. To exploit the vulnerability, a user would have to open a specially crafted file or lure the target to a website hosting malicious JavaScript. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft COM for Windows handles objects in memory. |
8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Function Discovery SSDP Provider improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Function Discovery SSDP Provider handles memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows State Repository Service improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application on the victim system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows State Repository Service handles objects in memory. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Text Service Module improperly handles memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain execution on a victim system. An attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability through Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), and then convince a user to view the website. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites and websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements by adding specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. In all cases, however, an attacker would have no way to force users to view the attacker-controlled content. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to take action, typically by way of enticement in an email or Instant Messenger message, or by getting them to open an attachment sent through email. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Text Service Module handles memory. |
7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Modules Installer improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application on the victim system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Modules Installer handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate specific malicious data from a user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by resolving the conditions where Hyper-V would fail to handle these requests. |
6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate specific malicious data from a user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by resolving the conditions where Hyper-V would fail to handle these requests. |
6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Storage Services improperly handle file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated privileges. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first need code execution on a victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows Storage Services properly handle file operations. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in how splwow64.exe handles certain calls. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system (low-integrity to medium-integrity). This vulnerability by itself does not allow arbitrary code execution; however, it could allow arbitrary code to be run if the attacker uses it in combination with another vulnerability (such as a remote code execution vulnerability or another elevation of privilege vulnerability) that is capable of leveraging the elevated privileges when code execution is attempted. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring splwow64.exe properly handles these calls. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Active Directory Federation Services (ADFS) improperly handles multi-factor authentication requests. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass some, but not all, of the authentication factors. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker could send a specially crafted authentication request. This security update corrects how ADFS handles multi-factor authentication requests. |
5.3 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when NTFS improperly checks access. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, and then run a specially crafted application to take control over the affected system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how NTFS checks access. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the dnsrslvr.dll handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the dnsrslvr.dll properly handles objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when a Windows Projected Filesystem improperly handles file redirections. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could delete a targeted file they would not have permissions to. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Projected Filesystem handle file redirections. |
5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A local elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in how splwow64.exe handles certain calls. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could elevate privileges on an affected system from low-integrity to medium-integrity. This vulnerability by itself does not allow arbitrary code execution; however, it could allow arbitrary code to be run if the attacker uses it in combination with another vulnerability (such as a remote code execution vulnerability or another elevation of privilege vulnerability) that is capable of leveraging the elevated privileges when code execution is attempted. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring splwow64.exe properly handles these calls.. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Store Runtime improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Microsoft Store Runtime handles memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Cryptographic Catalog Services improperly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could modify the cryptographic catalog. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by addressing how the Windows Cryptographic Catalog Services handle objects in memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows RSoP Service Application improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows RSoP Service Application handles memory. |
7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a program process a specially crafted image file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the dnsrslvr.dll handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the dnsrslvr.dll properly handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel that could allow an attacker to retrieve information that could lead to a Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) bypass. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could retrieve the memory address of a kernel object. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel handles memory addresses. | 4.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Function Discovery SSDP Provider improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Function Discovery SSDP Provider handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a program process a specially crafted image file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. | 7.3 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when DirectWrite improperly discloses the contents of its memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit an untrusted webpage. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how DirectWrite handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Setup in the way it handles permissions. A locally authenticated attacker could run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. After successfully exploiting the vulnerability, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring Windows Setup properly handles permissions. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge improperly accesses objects in memory. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that enables an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. An attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability through Microsoft Edge, and then convince a user to view the website. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites and websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements by adding specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. In all cases, however, an attacker would have no way to force users to view the attacker-controlled content. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to take action, typically by way of enticement in an email or Instant Messenger message, or by getting them to open an attachment sent through email. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how Microsoft Edge handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability through Internet Explorer and then convince a user to view the website. An attacker could also embed an ActiveX control marked "safe for initialization" in an application or Microsoft Office document that hosts the IE rendering engine. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites and websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements. These websites could contain specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how the scripting engine handles objects in memory. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the MSHTML engine improperly validates input. An attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. In a HTML editing attack scenario, an attacker could trick a user into editing a specially crafted file that is designed to exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how MSHTML engine validates input. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge PDF Reader improperly handles objects in memory. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that enables an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit the vulnerability, in a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a website that contains malicious PDF content. In addition, compromised websites and websites that accept or host user-provided content could contain specially crafted PDF content that could exploit the vulnerability. However, in all cases an attacker would have no way to force a user to view the attacker-controlled content. Instead, an attacker would have to convince a user to take action. For example, an attacker could trick a user into clicking a link that takes the user to the attacker's site. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how Microsoft Edge PDF Reader handles objects in memory. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the "Public Account Pictures" folder improperly handles junctions. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows handles junctions. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to take control of an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a victim system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by enticing a victim to open a specially crafted file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Jet Database Engine handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Graphics Components handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a target system. To exploit the vulnerability, a user would have to open a specially crafted file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Graphics Components handle objects in memory. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Graphics Components handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a target system. To exploit the vulnerability, a user would have to open a specially crafted file. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Graphics Components handle objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a victim system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by enticing a victim to open a specially crafted file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Jet Database Engine handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a program process a specially crafted image file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows WalletService handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows WalletService properly handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a victim system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by enticing a victim to open a specially crafted file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Jet Database Engine handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application on the victim system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Runtime handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media Foundation handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge (HTML-based). The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability through Microsoft Edge (HTML-based) and then convince a user to view the website. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites and websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements. These websites could contain specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how the scripting engine handles objects in memory. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Work Folder Service improperly handles file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application on the victim system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Work Folder Service handles file operations. | 8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows CDP User Components improperly handle memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows CDP User Components handle memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows CDP User Components improperly handle memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows CDP User Components handle memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows WaasMedic Service improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to improperly disclose memory. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows WaasMedic Service handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Remote Access improperly handles file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated privileges. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first need code execution on a victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows Remote Access properly handles file operations. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows UPnP Device Host improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows UPnP Device Host handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Service improperly handles file operations. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Service handles file operations. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Backup Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Accounts Control improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Accounts Control handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows WalletService handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows WalletService properly handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how GDI handles objects in memory and by preventing instances of unintended user-mode privilege elevation. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Remote Access improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Remote Access handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Custom Protocol Engine improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Custom Protocol Engine handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Radio Manager API improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Radio Manager API handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media Foundation handles objects in memory. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Network Connection Broker improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Network Connection Broker handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Speech Runtime improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Speech Runtime handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Speech Shell Components improperly handle memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Speech Shell Components handle memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Font Driver Host improperly handles memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability would gain execution on a victim system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Font Driver Host handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Speech Runtime improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Speech Runtime handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows File Server Resource Management Service improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows File Server Resource Management Service handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows UPnP Device Host improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows UPnP Device Host handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Work Folders Service improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Work Folders Service handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows File Server Resource Management Service improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows File Server Resource Management Service handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows CSC Service improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows CSC Service handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Telephony Server improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Telephony Server handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service improperly handles file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application on the victim system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service handles file operations. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows State Repository Service improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application on the victim system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows State Repository Service handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) when an authenticated attacker sends a specially crafted authentication request. A remote attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could cause an elevation of privilege on the target system's LSASS service. The security update addresses the vulnerability by changing the way that LSASS handles specially crafted authentication requests. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the win32k component improperly provides kernel information. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how win32k handles objects in memory. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media Foundation handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows CSC Service improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows CSC Service handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Storage Service improperly handles file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated privileges on the victim system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, then run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Storage Services handles file operations. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log onto an affected system and open a specially crafted file. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a website (or leverage a compromised website that accepts or hosts user-provided content) that contains a specially crafted file that is designed to exploit the vulnerability. However, an attacker would have no way to force the user to visit the website. Instead, an attacker would have to convince the user to click a link, typically by way of an enticement in an email or Instant Messenger message, and then convince the user to open the specially crafted file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Media Foundation handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows AppX Deployment Extensions improperly performs privilege management, resulting in access to system files. To exploit this vulnerability, an authenticated attacker would need to run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how AppX Deployment Extensions manages privileges. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows Image Acquisition (WIA) Service improperly discloses contents of its memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit the vulnerability, an authenticated attacker could connect an imaging device (camera, scanner, cellular phone) to an affected system and run a specially crafted application to disclose information. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the WIA Service handles objects in memory. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to take control of an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Work Folders Service improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Work Folders Service handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when DirectX improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how DirectX handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how GDI handles objects in memory and by preventing instances of unintended user-mode privilege elevation. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media Foundation handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media Foundation handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the srmsvc.dll handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the srmsvc.dll properly handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when ASP.NET or .NET web applications running on IIS improperly allow access to cached files. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain access to restricted files. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to send a specially crafted request to an affected server. The update addresses the vulnerability by changing how ASP.NET and .NET handle requests. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a victim system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by enticing a victim to open a specially crafted file. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows Jet Database Engine handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows Image Acquisition (WIA) Service improperly discloses contents of its memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system. To exploit the vulnerability, an authenticated attacker could connect an imaging device (camera, scanner, cellular phone) to an affected system and run a specially crafted application to disclose information. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the WIA Service handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles hard links. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could overwrite a targeted file leading to an elevated status. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows handles hard links. | 10 |
CRITICAL |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Work Folders Service improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Work Folders Service handles memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists on ARM implementations that use speculative execution in control flow via a side-channel analysis, aka "straight-line speculation." To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker with local privileges would need to run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by bypassing the speculative execution. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in RPC if the server has Routing and Remote Access enabled. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to run a specially crafted application against an RPC server which has Routing and Remote Access enabled. Routing and Remote Access is a non-default configuration; systems without it enabled are not vulnerable. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Routing and Remote Access service handles requests. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application to take control of an affected system. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows kernel handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media Foundation handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Kernel API improperly handles registry objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain elevated privileges on a targeted system. A locally authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by helping to ensure that the Windows Kernel API properly handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Kernel API improperly handles registry objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain elevated privileges on a targeted system. A locally authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by helping to ensure that the Windows Kernel API properly handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly allows arbitrary writing to the file system. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted script or application. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Print Spooler Component writes to the file system. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Media Audio Codec improperly handles objects. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media Audio Codec handles objects. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
GRUB2 fails to validate kernel signature when booted directly without shim, allowing secure boot to be bypassed. This only affects systems where the kernel signing certificate has been imported directly into the secure boot database and the GRUB image is booted directly without the use of shim. This issue affects GRUB2 version 2.04 and prior versions. | 6.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
GRUB2 contains a race condition in grub_script_function_create() leading to a use-after-free vulnerability which can be triggered by redefining a function whilst the same function is already executing, leading to arbitrary code execution and secure boot restriction bypass. This issue affects GRUB2 version 2.04 and prior versions. | 6.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
Integer overflows were discovered in the functions grub_cmd_initrd and grub_initrd_init in the efilinux component of GRUB2, as shipped in Debian, Red Hat, and Ubuntu (the functionality is not included in GRUB2 upstream), leading to a heap-based buffer overflow. These could be triggered by an extremely large number of arguments to the initrd command on 32-bit architectures, or a crafted filesystem with very large files on any architecture. An attacker could use this to execute arbitrary code and bypass UEFI Secure Boot restrictions. This issue affects GRUB2 version 2.04 and prior versions. | 6.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Windows Codecs Library Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1425. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remoted code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Windows Codecs Library Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1457. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the SharedStream Library handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows SharedStream Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents of its memory, aka 'Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Skype for Business is accessed via Microsoft Edge (EdgeHTML-based), aka 'Skype for Business via Microsoft Edge (EdgeHTML-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 4.3 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Network Connections Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Network Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1373, CVE-2020-1390, CVE-2020-1427, CVE-2020-1428. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows font library improperly handles specially crafted fonts.For all systems except Windows 10, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code remotely, aka 'Windows Font Library Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Network Location Awareness Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Network Location Awareness Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Sync Host Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Sync Host Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 5.3 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles objects in the memory, aka 'GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Skype for Business is accessed via Internet Explorer, aka 'Skype for Business via Internet Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 4.3 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge PDF Reader improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Edge PDF Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows UPnP Device Host improperly handles memory.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1354. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows AppX Deployment Extensions improperly performs privilege management, resulting in access to system files.To exploit this vulnerability, an authenticated attacker would need to run a specially crafted application to elevate privileges.The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how AppX Deployment Extensions manages privileges., aka 'Windows AppX Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Network Connections Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Network Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1373, CVE-2020-1390, CVE-2020-1427, CVE-2020-1438. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Error Reporting manager improperly handles a process crash, aka 'Windows Error Reporting Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1367, CVE-2020-1389, CVE-2020-1419. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Network Connections Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Network Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1373, CVE-2020-1390, CVE-2020-1428, CVE-2020-1438. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1249, CVE-2020-1353, CVE-2020-1370, CVE-2020-1399, CVE-2020-1404, CVE-2020-1413, CVE-2020-1414, CVE-2020-1415. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Update Stack fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Update Stack Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1249, CVE-2020-1353, CVE-2020-1370, CVE-2020-1399, CVE-2020-1404, CVE-2020-1413, CVE-2020-1414, CVE-2020-1422. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1249, CVE-2020-1353, CVE-2020-1370, CVE-2020-1399, CVE-2020-1404, CVE-2020-1414, CVE-2020-1415, CVE-2020-1422. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1249, CVE-2020-1353, CVE-2020-1370, CVE-2020-1399, CVE-2020-1404, CVE-2020-1413, CVE-2020-1415, CVE-2020-1422. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1400, CVE-2020-1401. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1249, CVE-2020-1353, CVE-2020-1370, CVE-2020-1399, CVE-2020-1413, CVE-2020-1414, CVE-2020-1415, CVE-2020-1422. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows ActiveX Installer Service improperly handles memory.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows ActiveX Installer Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory, aka 'VBScript Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1401, CVE-2020-1407. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1400, CVE-2020-1407. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Lockscreen fails to properly handle Ease of Access dialog.An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute commands with elevated permissions.The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring that the Ease of Access dialog is handled properly., aka 'Windows Lockscreen Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 6.8 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1249, CVE-2020-1353, CVE-2020-1370, CVE-2020-1404, CVE-2020-1413, CVE-2020-1414, CVE-2020-1415, CVE-2020-1422. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles calls to Advanced Local Procedure Call (ALPC).An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the security context of the local system, aka 'Windows ALPC Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in Windows when the Windows Imaging Component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Imaging Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Geolocation Framework handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1388, CVE-2020-1392, CVE-2020-1395. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Speech Brokered API handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1388, CVE-2020-1392, CVE-2020-1394. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Delivery Optimization service improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1388, CVE-2020-1394, CVE-2020-1395. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service fails to properly sanitize input, leading to an unsecure library-loading behavior, aka 'Windows Diagnostics Hub Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1418. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Network Connections Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Network Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1373, CVE-2020-1427, CVE-2020-1428, CVE-2020-1438. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows Agent Activation Runtime (AarSvc) fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Agent Activation Runtime Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way the Windows Push Notification Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Push Notification Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the psmsrv.dll handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1392, CVE-2020-1394, CVE-2020-1395. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly initialize a memory address, aka 'Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1367, CVE-2020-1419, CVE-2020-1426. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Credential Picker handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Credential Picker Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information vulnerability exists when Windows Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service improperly discloses file information, aka 'Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Graphics Component improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1381. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Cryptography Next Generation (CNG) Key Isolation service improperly handles memory, aka 'Windows CNG Key Isolation Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1359. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles COM object creation, aka 'Windows COM Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Graphics Component improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1382. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Network Connections Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Network Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1390, CVE-2020-1427, CVE-2020-1428, CVE-2020-1438. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the Windows Remote Desktop Client when a user connects to a malicious server, aka 'Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Event Logging Service improperly handles memory.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows Event Logging Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1365. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Mobile Device Management (MDM) Diagnostics improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Mobile Device Management Diagnostics Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1405. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows WalletService handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1344, CVE-2020-1362. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1249, CVE-2020-1353, CVE-2020-1399, CVE-2020-1404, CVE-2020-1413, CVE-2020-1414, CVE-2020-1415, CVE-2020-1422. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Workflow Service improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Print Workflow Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1389, CVE-2020-1419, CVE-2020-1426. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Credential Enrollment Manager service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Credential Enrollment Manager Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists in the way that the WalletService handles files, aka 'Windows WalletService Denial of Service Vulnerability'. | 7.1 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Event Logging Service improperly handles memory.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows Event Logging Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1371. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows WalletService handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1344, CVE-2020-1369. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Picker Platform improperly handles memory.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows Picker Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Profile Service improperly handles file operations, aka 'Windows Profile Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way that the WalletService handles memory.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first need code execution on a victim system, aka 'Windows WalletService Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows Resource Policy component improperly handles memory.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows Resource Policy Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Cryptography Next Generation (CNG) Key Isolation service improperly handles memory, aka 'Windows CNG Key Isolation Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1384. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows System Events Broker improperly handles file operations, aka 'Windows System Events Broker Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows UPnP Device Host improperly handles memory.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1430. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Font Driver Host improperly handles memory.An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability would gain execution on a victim system.The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Font Driver Host handles memory., aka 'Windows Font Driver Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows Graphics component improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows USO Core Worker improperly handles memory.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows USO Core Worker Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1249, CVE-2020-1370, CVE-2020-1399, CVE-2020-1404, CVE-2020-1413, CVE-2020-1414, CVE-2020-1415, CVE-2020-1422. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Modules Installer improperly handles file operations, aka 'Windows Modules Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Storage Services improperly handle file operations, aka 'Windows Storage Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows WalletService handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1362, CVE-2020-1369. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Group Policy Services Policy Processing improperly handle reparse points, aka 'Group Policy Services Policy Processing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 6.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring the Windows Kernel properly handles objects in memory. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Windows Mobile Device Management (MDM) Diagnostics improperly handles junctions, aka 'Windows Mobile Device Management Diagnostics Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1353, CVE-2020-1370, CVE-2020-1399, CVE-2020-1404, CVE-2020-1413, CVE-2020-1414, CVE-2020-1415, CVE-2020-1422. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
This security update corrects a denial of service in the Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) caused when an authenticated attacker sends a specially crafted authentication request, aka 'Local Security Authority Subsystem Service Denial of Service Vulnerability'. | 4.9 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in .NET Framework, Microsoft SharePoint, and Visual Studio when the software fails to check the source markup of XML file input, aka '.NET Framework, SharePoint Server, and Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Function Discovery Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Function Discovery Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Adobe Flash Player Desktop Runtime 32.0.0.371 and earlier, Adobe Flash Player for Google Chrome 32.0.0.371 and earlier, and Adobe Flash Player for Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer 32.0.0.330 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents of its memory, aka 'Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1231, CVE-2020-1233, CVE-2020-1235, CVE-2020-1265, CVE-2020-1282, CVE-2020-1304, CVE-2020-1306. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege (user to user) vulnerability exists in Windows Security Health Service when handling certain objects in memory.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1162. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Group Policy improperly checks access, aka 'Group Policy Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Internet Explorer improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Internet Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 5.3 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269, CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275, CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Update Orchestrator Service improperly handles file operations, aka 'Windows Update Orchestrator Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Text Service Framework (TSF) when the TSF server fails to properly handle messages sent from TSF clients, aka 'Windows Text Service Framework Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Component Object Model (COM) client uses special case IIDs, aka 'Component Object Model Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Installer because of the way Windows Installer handles certain filesystem operations.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would require unprivileged execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1272, CVE-2020-1277, CVE-2020-1302. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Store Runtime improperly handles memory.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'Microsoft Store Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1222. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1231, CVE-2020-1233, CVE-2020-1235, CVE-2020-1265, CVE-2020-1282, CVE-2020-1304, CVE-2020-1334. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269, CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275, CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1316. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1231, CVE-2020-1233, CVE-2020-1235, CVE-2020-1265, CVE-2020-1282, CVE-2020-1306, CVE-2020-1334. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows State Repository Service improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows State Repository Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Microsoft Server Message Block 1.0 (SMBv1) server handles certain requests, aka 'Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Installer because of the way Windows Installer handles certain filesystem operations.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would require unprivileged execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1272, CVE-2020-1277, CVE-2020-1312. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows that could allow remote code execution if a .LNK file is processed.An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the local user, aka 'LNK Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Microsoft Windows fails to properly handle cabinet files.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would have to convince a user to either open a specially crafted cabinet file or spoof a network printer and trick a user into installing a malicious cabinet file disguised as a printer driver.The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows handles cabinet files., aka 'Windows Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
A vulnerability exists in the way the Windows Diagnostics & feedback settings app handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Diagnostics & feedback Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows WalletService handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1287. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in OpenSSH for Windows when it does not properly restrict access to configuration settings, aka 'OpenSSH for Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service improperly handles file operations, aka 'Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1257, CVE-2020-1278. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the win32k component improperly provides kernel information, aka 'Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Network Connections Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Network Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Shell does not properly validate file paths.An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the context of the current user, aka 'Windows Shell Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows WalletService handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1294. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Denial of Service Vulnerability'. | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists in the way that the Microsoft Server Message Block 3.1.1 (SMBv3) protocol handles certain requests, aka 'Windows SMBv3 Client/Server Denial of Service Vulnerability'. | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Microsoft Windows OLE fails to properly validate user input, aka 'Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1231, CVE-2020-1233, CVE-2020-1235, CVE-2020-1265, CVE-2020-1304, CVE-2020-1306, CVE-2020-1334. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Lockscreen fails to properly load spotlight images from a secure location, aka 'Windows Lockscreen Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Bluetooth Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Bluetooth Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Installer because of the way Windows Installer handles certain filesystem operations.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would require unprivileged execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1272, CVE-2020-1302, CVE-2020-1312. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service improperly handles file operations, aka 'Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1257, CVE-2020-1293. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269, CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269, CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275, CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269, CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1275, CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Backup Service improperly handles file operations.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows Backup Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the Windows Installer when the Windows Installer fails to properly sanitize input leading to an insecure library loading behavior.A locally authenticated attacker could run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges, aka 'Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1277, CVE-2020-1302, CVE-2020-1312. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when a Windows service improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275, CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the wlansvc.dll handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows WLAN Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1269, CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275, CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way Windows Error Reporting (WER) handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Error Reporting Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1261. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269, CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275, CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way Windows Error Reporting (WER) handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Error Reporting Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1263. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269, CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275, CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when Windows Host Guardian Service improperly handles hashes recorded and logged, aka 'Windows Host Guardian Service Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability'. | 4.3 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service improperly handles file operations, aka 'Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1278, CVE-2020-1293. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when DirectX improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectX Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 6.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1207, CVE-2020-1247, CVE-2020-1251, CVE-2020-1310. | 6.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Modules Installer Service improperly handles class object members.A locally authenticated attacker could run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges, aka 'Windows Modules Installer Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) IIS module improperly handles uploaded content, aka 'Windows Background Intelligent Transfer Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles objects in the memory, aka 'GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1207, CVE-2020-1247, CVE-2020-1253, CVE-2020-1310. | 6.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269, CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275, CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1207, CVE-2020-1251, CVE-2020-1253, CVE-2020-1310. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Edge handles cross-origin requests, aka 'Microsoft Edge Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 5.3 |
MEDIUM |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service improperly handles file operations, aka 'Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service Denial of Service Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1120. | 7.1 |
HIGH |
||
A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Media Foundation Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1238. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when Windows Kernel fails to properly sanitize certain parameters.To exploit the vulnerability, a locally-authenticated attacker could attempt to run a specially crafted application on a targeted system.The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Kernel handles parameter sanitization., aka 'Windows Kernel Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269, CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275, CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Media Foundation Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1239. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Error Reporting improperly handles objects in memory.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'Windows Error Reporting Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1231, CVE-2020-1233, CVE-2020-1265, CVE-2020-1282, CVE-2020-1304, CVE-2020-1306, CVE-2020-1334. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1208. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Media Foundation Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1231, CVE-2020-1235, CVE-2020-1265, CVE-2020-1282, CVE-2020-1304, CVE-2020-1306, CVE-2020-1334. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory, aka 'VBScript Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1213, CVE-2020-1214, CVE-2020-1215, CVE-2020-1216, CVE-2020-1260. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1233, CVE-2020-1235, CVE-2020-1265, CVE-2020-1282, CVE-2020-1304, CVE-2020-1306, CVE-2020-1334. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft browsers access objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Browser Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A spoofing vulnerability exists when theMicrosoft Edge (Chromium-based) in IE Mode improperly handles specific redirects, aka 'Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) in IE Mode Spoofing Vulnerability'. | 6.1 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Store Runtime improperly handles memory.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'Microsoft Store Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1309. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory, aka 'VBScript Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1213, CVE-2020-1214, CVE-2020-1215, CVE-2020-1230, CVE-2020-1260. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Runtime Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory, aka 'VBScript Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1213, CVE-2020-1215, CVE-2020-1216, CVE-2020-1230, CVE-2020-1260. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory, aka 'VBScript Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1213, CVE-2020-1214, CVE-2020-1216, CVE-2020-1230, CVE-2020-1260. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when an OLE Automation component improperly handles memory.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system, aka 'OLE Automation Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory, aka 'VBScript Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1214, CVE-2020-1215, CVE-2020-1216, CVE-2020-1230, CVE-2020-1260. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Network List Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Network List Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Connected Devices Platform Service handles objects in memory, aka 'Connected Devices Platform Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1247, CVE-2020-1251, CVE-2020-1253, CVE-2020-1310. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1236. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector or the Visual Studio Standard Collector fail to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Diagnostic Hub Standard Collector Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1202. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Mobile Device Management (MDM) Diagnostics improperly handles junctions, aka 'Windows Mobile Device Management Diagnostics Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.1 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way that the Microsoft Server Message Block 3.1.1 (SMBv3) protocol handles certain requests, aka 'Windows SMBv3 Client/Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way the Windows Now Playing Session Manager handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Now Playing Session Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector or the Visual Studio Standard Collector fail to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Diagnostic Hub Standard Collector Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1203. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows Error Reporting manager improperly handles a process crash, aka 'Windows Error Reporting Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows Registry improperly handles filesystem operations, aka 'Windows Registry Denial of Service Vulnerability'. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the printconfig.dll handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Print Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Microsoft Windows Graphics Component improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Microsoft Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege (user to user) vulnerability exists in Windows Security Health Service when handling certain objects in memory.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1324. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service improperly handles file operations, aka 'Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service Denial of Service Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1244. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows GDI Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0915. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269, CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275, CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows GDI Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0916. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Flash Player Desktop Runtime versions 32.0.0.114 and earlier, Flash Player for Google Chrome versions 32.0.0.114 and earlier, and Flash Player for Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer 11 versions 32.0.0.114 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure. | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0806, CVE-2019-0810, CVE-2019-0829, CVE-2019-0860, CVE-2019-0861. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8541, CVE-2018-8543, CVE-2018-8551, CVE-2018-8555, CVE-2018-8556, CVE-2018-8557, CVE-2018-8588. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8541, CVE-2018-8542, CVE-2018-8551, CVE-2018-8555, CVE-2018-8556, CVE-2018-8557, CVE-2018-8588. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8541, CVE-2018-8542, CVE-2018-8543, CVE-2018-8555, CVE-2018-8556, CVE-2018-8557, CVE-2018-8588. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8541, CVE-2018-8542, CVE-2018-8543, CVE-2018-8551, CVE-2018-8556, CVE-2018-8557, CVE-2018-8588. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8541, CVE-2018-8542, CVE-2018-8543, CVE-2018-8551, CVE-2018-8555, CVE-2018-8557, CVE-2018-8588. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8541, CVE-2018-8542, CVE-2018-8543, CVE-2018-8551, CVE-2018-8555, CVE-2018-8556, CVE-2018-8588. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A spoofing vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge improperly handles specific HTML content, aka "Microsoft Edge Spoofing Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge. | 4.3 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8541, CVE-2018-8542, CVE-2018-8543, CVE-2018-8551, CVE-2018-8555, CVE-2018-8556, CVE-2018-8557. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows 10 does not warn users before opening executable files with the SettingContent-ms extension even when they have been downloaded from the internet and have the "Mark of the Web." Without the warning, unsuspecting users unfamiliar with this new file type might run an unwanted executable. This also allows a WebExtension with the limited downloads.open permission to execute arbitrary code without user interaction on Windows 10 systems. *Note: this issue only affects Windows operating systems. Other operating systems are unaffected.*. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 60, Thunderbird < 52.9, Firefox ESR < 60.1, Firefox ESR < 52.9, and Firefox < 61. | 8.1 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the browser scripting engine improperly handle object types, aka "Microsoft Scripting Engine Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore, Internet Explorer 11, Microsoft Edge, Internet Explorer 10. | 4.2 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the scripting engine does not properly handle objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka "Scripting Engine Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore, Internet Explorer 11, Microsoft Edge. | 4.3 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore, Internet Explorer 11, Microsoft Edge. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8353, CVE-2018-8359, CVE-2018-8371, CVE-2018-8372, CVE-2018-8373, CVE-2018-8385, CVE-2018-8389, CVE-2018-8390. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 9, ChakraCore, Internet Explorer 11, Microsoft Edge, Internet Explorer 10. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8353, CVE-2018-8355, CVE-2018-8359, CVE-2018-8371, CVE-2018-8372, CVE-2018-8373, CVE-2018-8389, CVE-2018-8390. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 29.0.0.140 and earlier have an exploitable type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly initialize a memory address, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0960, CVE-2018-0968, CVE-2018-0969, CVE-2018-0970, CVE-2018-0971, CVE-2018-0972, CVE-2018-0973, CVE-2018-0974, CVE-2018-0975. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel improperly handles objects in memory, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0887, CVE-2018-0968, CVE-2018-0969, CVE-2018-0970, CVE-2018-0971, CVE-2018-0972, CVE-2018-0973, CVE-2018-0974, CVE-2018-0975. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel that could allow an attacker to retrieve information that could lead to a Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) bypass, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0887, CVE-2018-0960, CVE-2018-0969, CVE-2018-0970, CVE-2018-0971, CVE-2018-0972, CVE-2018-0973, CVE-2018-0974, CVE-2018-0975. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel that could allow an attacker to retrieve information that could lead to a Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) bypass, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0887, CVE-2018-0960, CVE-2018-0968, CVE-2018-0970, CVE-2018-0971, CVE-2018-0972, CVE-2018-0973, CVE-2018-0974, CVE-2018-0975. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel that could allow an attacker to retrieve information that could lead to a Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) bypass, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0887, CVE-2018-0960, CVE-2018-0968, CVE-2018-0969, CVE-2018-0971, CVE-2018-0972, CVE-2018-0973, CVE-2018-0974, CVE-2018-0975. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel that could allow an attacker to retrieve information that could lead to a Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) bypass, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0887, CVE-2018-0960, CVE-2018-0968, CVE-2018-0969, CVE-2018-0970, CVE-2018-0972, CVE-2018-0973, CVE-2018-0974, CVE-2018-0975. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel that could allow an attacker to retrieve information that could lead to a Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) bypass, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0887, CVE-2018-0960, CVE-2018-0968, CVE-2018-0969, CVE-2018-0970, CVE-2018-0971, CVE-2018-0973, CVE-2018-0974, CVE-2018-0975. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel that could allow an attacker to retrieve information that could lead to a Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) bypass, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0887, CVE-2018-0960, CVE-2018-0968, CVE-2018-0969, CVE-2018-0970, CVE-2018-0971, CVE-2018-0972, CVE-2018-0974, CVE-2018-0975. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel that could allow an attacker to retrieve information that could lead to a Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) bypass, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0887, CVE-2018-0960, CVE-2018-0968, CVE-2018-0969, CVE-2018-0970, CVE-2018-0971, CVE-2018-0972, CVE-2018-0973, CVE-2018-0975. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel that could allow an attacker to retrieve information that could lead to a Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) bypass, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0887, CVE-2018-0960, CVE-2018-0968, CVE-2018-0969, CVE-2018-0970, CVE-2018-0971, CVE-2018-0972, CVE-2018-0973, CVE-2018-0974. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
On F5 BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.0.3 or 13.0.0, when authenticated administrative users execute commands in the Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also referred to as the BIG-IP Configuration utility, restrictions on allowed commands may not be enforced. | 7.2 |
HIGH |
||
An uninitialised stack variable in the nxfuse component that is part of the Open Source DokanFS library shipped with NoMachine 6.0.66_2 and earlier allows a local low privileged user to gain elevation of privileges on Windows 7 (32 and 64bit), and denial of service for Windows 8 and 10. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A use-after-free vulnerability was discovered in Adobe Flash Player before 28.0.0.161. This vulnerability occurs due to a dangling pointer in the Primetime SDK related to media player's quality of service functionality. A successful attack can lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
A use-after-free vulnerability was discovered in Adobe Flash Player before 28.0.0.161. This vulnerability occurs due to a dangling pointer in the Primetime SDK related to media player handling of listener objects. A successful attack can lead to arbitrary code execution. This was exploited in the wild in January and February 2018. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Microsoft Edge in Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, 1709, Windows Server 2016 and Windows Server, version 1709 allows an attacker to take control of an affected system, due to how the scripting engine handles objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11836, CVE-2017-11837, CVE-2017-11838, CVE-2017-11840, CVE-2017-11841, CVE-2017-11843, CVE-2017-11846, CVE-2017-11858, CVE-2017-11859, CVE-2017-11861, CVE-2017-11862, CVE-2017-11866, CVE-2017-11869, CVE-2017-11870, CVE-2017-11871, and CVE-2017-11873. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
ChakraCore and Internet Explorer in Microsoft Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 and R2, and Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer in Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, 1709, Windows Server 2016 and Windows Server, version 1709 allows an attacker to obtain information to further compromise the user's system, due to how the scripting engine handles objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Information Disclosure Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11834. | 3.1 |
LOW |
||
Microsoft Edge in Microsoft Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, 1709, Windows Server 2016 and Windows Server, version 1709 allows an attacker to determine the origin of all webpages in the affected browser, due to how Microsoft Edge handles cross-origin requests, aka "Microsoft Edge Information Disclosure Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11803 and CVE-2017-11844. | 3.1 |
LOW |
||
ChakraCore and Internet Explorer in Microsoft Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer in Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, 1709, Windows Server 2016 and Windows Server, version 1709 allows an attacker to gain the same user rights as the current user, due to how the scripting engine handles objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11836, CVE-2017-11838, CVE-2017-11839, CVE-2017-11840, CVE-2017-11841, CVE-2017-11843, CVE-2017-11846, CVE-2017-11858, CVE-2017-11859, CVE-2017-11861, CVE-2017-11862, CVE-2017-11866, CVE-2017-11869, CVE-2017-11870, CVE-2017-11871, and CVE-2017-11873. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
ChakraCore and Internet Explorer in Microsoft Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer in Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, 1709, Windows Server 2016 and Windows Server, version 1709 allows an attacker to gain the same user rights as the current user, due to how the scripting engine handles objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11836, CVE-2017-11837, CVE-2017-11839, CVE-2017-11840, CVE-2017-11841, CVE-2017-11843, CVE-2017-11846, CVE-2017-11858, CVE-2017-11859, CVE-2017-11861, CVE-2017-11862, CVE-2017-11866, CVE-2017-11869, CVE-2017-11870, CVE-2017-11871, and CVE-2017-11873. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
ChakraCore and Internet Explorer in Microsoft Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 and R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer in Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, 1709, Windows Server 2016 and Windows Server, version 1709 allows an attacker to gain the same user rights as the current user, due to how the scripting engine handles objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11836, CVE-2017-11837, CVE-2017-11838, CVE-2017-11839, CVE-2017-11840, CVE-2017-11841, CVE-2017-11846, CVE-2017-11858, CVE-2017-11859, CVE-2017-11861, CVE-2017-11862, CVE-2017-11866, CVE-2017-11869, CVE-2017-11870, CVE-2017-11871, and CVE-2017-11873. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
ChakraCore and Internet Explorer in Microsoft Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 and R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 and R2, and Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer in Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, 1709, Windows Server 2016 and Windows Server, version 1709 allows an attacker to gain the same user rights as the current user, due to how the scripting engine handles objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11836, CVE-2017-11837, CVE-2017-11838, CVE-2017-11839, CVE-2017-11840, CVE-2017-11841, CVE-2017-11843, CVE-2017-11858, CVE-2017-11859, CVE-2017-11861, CVE-2017-11862, CVE-2017-11866, CVE-2017-11869, CVE-2017-11870, CVE-2017-11871, and CVE-2017-11873. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Windows kernel in Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 and RT1, Windows Server 2012 and R2, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and 1709, Windows Server 2016, and Windows Server, version 1709 allows an attacker to run arbitrary code in kernel mode, install programs, view, change or delete data, and create new accounts with full user rights due to improperly handing objects in memory, aka "Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability". | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows kernel in Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 and RT 8.1, Server 2012 and R2, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and 1709, Windows Server 2016, and Windows Server, version 1709 allows an attacker to log in and run a specially crafted application due to the Windows kernel improperly initializing a memory address, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11842, CVE-2017-11851, and CVE-2017-11853. | 4.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows kernel in Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 and RT 8.1, Server 2012 and R2, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and 1709, Windows Server 2016, and Windows Server, version 1709 allows an attacker to log in and run a specially crafted application due to the Windows kernel improperly initializing a memory address, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11842, CVE-2017-11849, and CVE-2017-11851. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
ChakraCore and Internet Explorer in Microsoft Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 and R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 and R2, and Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer in Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, 1709, Windows Server 2016 and Windows Server, version 1709 allows an attacker to gain the same user rights as the current user, due to how Microsoft browsers handle objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11836, CVE-2017-11837, CVE-2017-11838, CVE-2017-11839, CVE-2017-11840, CVE-2017-11841, CVE-2017-11843, CVE-2017-11846, CVE-2017-11859, CVE-2017-11861, CVE-2017-11862, CVE-2017-11866, CVE-2017-11869, CVE-2017-11870, CVE-2017-11871, and CVE-2017-11873. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Microsoft Edge in Microsoft Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, 1709, Windows Server 2016 and Windows Server, version 1709 allows an attacker to trick a user into loading a page containing malicious content, due to how the Edge Content Security Policy (CSP) validates documents, aka "Microsoft Edge Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11872 and CVE-2017-11874. | 6.1 |
MEDIUM |
||
Windows kernel in Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 and RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 and R2, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an attacker to run a specially crafted application and obtain information to further compromise the user's system due to the Windows kernel improperly initializing objects in memory, aka "Windows Information Disclosure Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11831. | 4.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
In SpiderControl MicroBrowser Windows XP, Vista 7, 8 and 10, Versions 1.6.30.144 and prior, an uncontrolled search path element vulnerability has been identified which could be exploited by placing a specially crafted DLL file in the search path. If the malicious DLL is loaded prior to the valid DLL, an attacker could execute arbitrary code on the system. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A privilege escalation vulnerability was identified in Lenovo Active Protection System for ThinkPad systems versions earlier than 1.82.0.17. An attacker with local privileges could execute code with administrative privileges via an unquoted service path. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Use after free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player Desktop Runtime before 20.0.0.267, Adobe Flash Player Extended Support Release before 18.0.0.324, Adobe Flash Player for Google Chrome before 20.0.0.267, Adobe Flash Player for Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer 11 before 20.0.0.267, Adobe Flash Player for Internet Explorer 10 and 11 before 20.0.0.267, Adobe Flash Player for Linux before 11.2.202.559, AIR Desktop Runtime before 20.0.0.233, AIR SDK before 20.0.0.233, AIR SDK & Compiler before 20.0.0.233, AIR for Android before 20.0.0.233. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Privilege escalation vulnerability in Lenovo Nerve Center for Windows 10 on Desktop systems (Lenovo Nerve Center for notebook systems is not affected) that could allow an attacker with local privileges on a system to alter registry keys. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.171 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability when manipulating the ActionsScript 2 XML class. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.171 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the MPEG-4 AVC module. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.171 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the PNG image parser. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.171 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the Adobe Texture Format (ATF) module. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.171 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the internal representation of raster data. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.171 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability during internal computation caused by multiple display object mask manipulations. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.171 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the LocaleID class. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Windows Hyper-V in Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an attacker to gain elevated privileges on a target guest operating system when Windows Hyper-V instruction emulation fails to properly enforce privilege levels, aka "Hypervisor Code Integrity Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability". | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Uniscribe in Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Microsoft Office 2010 SP2, Microsoft Office Word Viewer, Microsoft Lync 2013 SP1, Skype for Business 2016, Microsoft Silverlight 5 Developer Runtime when installed on Microsoft Windows, and Microsoft Silverlight 5 when installed on Microsoft Windows allows a remote code execution vulnerability due to the way it handles objects in memory, aka "Windows Uniscribe Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8528. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to memory corruption. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8540 and CVE-2017-8541. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8535, CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8537, and CVE-2017-8542. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to memory corruption. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8538 and CVE-2017-8540. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8535, CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8537, and CVE-2017-8539. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
The Windows kernel in Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows authenticated attackers to obtain sensitive information via a specially crafted document, aka "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-0175, CVE-2017-0220, and CVE-2017-0259. | 4.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
Conexant Systems mictray64 task, as used on HP Elite, EliteBook, ProBook, and ZBook systems, leaks sensitive data (keystrokes) to any process. In mictray64.exe (mic tray icon) 1.0.0.46, a LowLevelKeyboardProc Windows hook is used to capture keystrokes. This data is leaked via unintended channels: debug messages accessible to any process that is running in the current user session, and filesystem access to C:\Users\Public\MicTray.log by any process. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A Win32k information disclosure vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows when the win32k component improperly provides kernel information. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user's system, aka "Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability." | 4.7 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows 7, Windows 8.1, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Windows Server 2016 when the Microsoft Graphics Component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." | 7 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Microsoft Windows running on Windows 10, Windows 10 1511, Windows 8.1 Windows RT 8.1, and Windows Server 2012 R2 fails to properly sanitize handles in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V Network Switch running on a Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, or Windows Server 2016 host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0163, CVE-2017-0180, and CVE-2017-0181. | 7.6 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V Network Switch running on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0162, CVE-2017-0180, and CVE-2017-0181. | 7.6 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Microsoft Windows running on Windows 10, Windows 10 1511, Windows 8.1, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows Server 2012 R2 fails to properly sanitize handles in memory, aka "Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when LDAP request buffer lengths are improperly calculated. In a remote attack scenario, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a specially crafted application to send malicious traffic to a Domain Controller, aka "LDAP Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." | 8.1 |
HIGH |
||
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in Windows 8.1, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows 10, and Windows Server 2016 when the Windows kernel improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user's system, a.k.a. "Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability." | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V running on Windows 10, Windows 10 1511, Windows 10 1607, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Windows Server 2016 host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0179, CVE-2017-0182, CVE-2017-0183, CVE-2017-0184, CVE-2017-0185, and CVE-2017-0186. | 5.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V running on a Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, or Windows Server 2016 host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0178, CVE-2017-0182, CVE-2017-0183, CVE-2017-0184, CVE-2017-0185, and CVE-2017-0186. | 5.8 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V Network Switch running on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0162, CVE-2017-0163, and CVE-2017-0181. | 7.6 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V Network Switch running on a Windows 10 or Windows Server 2016 host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0162, CVE-2017-0163, and CVE-2017-0180. | 7.6 |
HIGH |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V Network Switch running on a Windows 10, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, or Windows Server 2016 host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0178, CVE-2017-0179, CVE-2017-0183, CVE-2017-0184, CVE-2017-0185, and CVE-2017-0186. | 5.8 |
MEDIUM |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V Network Switch running on a Windows 10, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, or Windows Server 2016 host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0178, CVE-2017-0179, CVE-2017-0182, CVE-2017-0184, CVE-2017-0185, and CVE-2017-0186. | 5.8 |
MEDIUM |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V running on a host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0178, CVE-2017-0179, CVE-2017-0182, CVE-2017-0183, CVE-2017-0185, and CVE-2017-0186. | 5.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V Network Switch running on a Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, or Windows Server 2016 host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0178, CVE-2017-0179, CVE-2017-0182, CVE-2017-0183, CVE-2017-0184, and CVE-2017-0186. | 5.8 |
MEDIUM |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V Network Switch running on a Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, or Windows Server 2016 host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0178, CVE-2017-0179, CVE-2017-0182, CVE-2017-0183, CVE-2017-0184, and CVE-2017-0185. | 5.8 |
MEDIUM |
||
A Win32k information disclosure vulnerability exists in Windows 8.1, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows 10, and Windows Server 2016 when the win32k component improperly provides kernel information. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user's system, aka "Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0189. | 3.3 |
LOW |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows 10 when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0188. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A denial of service vulnerability exists in the way that Windows 7, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Windows Server 2016 handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could cause a target system to stop responding, aka "Windows Denial of Service Vulnerability." | 5.8 |
MEDIUM |
||
The Adobe Type Manager Font Driver (ATMFD.dll) in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold , 1511, 1607, and 1703 allows an attacker to gain sensitive information via a specially crafted document or an untrusted website, aka "ATMFD.dll Information Disclosure Vulnerability." | 4.3 |
MEDIUM |
||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Windows Server 2016 versions of Microsoft Windows OLE when it fails an integrity-level check, aka "Windows OLE Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.127 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability in the sound class. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.127 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability in the internal script object. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.127 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the ActionScript2 code parser. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.127 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the SWF parser. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.127 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability in ActionScript2 when creating a getter/setter property. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.127 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability in the ActionScript2 NetStream class. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.127 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability when parsing a shape outline. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
The kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2016 allow local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0026, CVE-2017-0056, CVE-2017-0078, CVE-2017-0079, CVE-2017-0080, CVE-2017-0081, and CVE-2017-0082. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Hyper-V in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and 2008 R2; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 and R2; Windows 10, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows guest OS users, running as virtual machines, to cause a denial of service via a crafted application, aka "Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0098, CVE-2017-0076, CVE-2017-0097, and CVE-2017-0099. | 5.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
Hyper-V in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and 2008 R2; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 and R2; Windows 10, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows guest OS users, running as virtual machines, to cause a denial of service via a crafted application, aka "Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0098, CVE-2017-0074, CVE-2017-0097, and CVE-2017-0099. | 5.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
Uniscribe in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607, and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site, aka "Windows Uniscribe Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0072, CVE-2017-0083, CVE-2017-0086, CVE-2017-0087, CVE-2017-0088, CVE-2017-0089, and CVE-2017-0090. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Hyper-V in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and 2008 R2; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 and R2; Windows 10, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows guest OS users, running as virtual machines, to cause a denial of service via a crafted application, aka "Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0098, CVE-2017-0074, CVE-2017-0076, and CVE-2017-0099. | 5.4 |
MEDIUM |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, and CVE-2017-0151. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, and CVE-2017-0150. | 7.5 |
HIGH |
||
Privilege escalation vulnerability in Windows 7 and Windows 10 in McAfee Security Scan Plus (SSP) 3.11.376 allows attackers to load a replacement of the version.dll file via McAfee McUICnt.exe onto a Windows system. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Unspecified vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player 21.0.0.242 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, as exploited in the wild in June 2016. | 9.8 |
CRITICAL |
||
Microsoft Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows 10 1511, and Microsoft Edge allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via a crafted PDF document, aka "Windows PDF Information Disclosure Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-3201. | 5.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
GDI in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold and 1511 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted document, aka "Windows Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0169. | 6.5 |
MEDIUM |
||
GDI in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold and 1511 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted document, aka "Windows Graphics Component RCE Vulnerability." | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
The kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold and 1511 allow local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0173, CVE-2016-0174, and CVE-2016-0196. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
The kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold and 1511 allow local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0171, CVE-2016-0174, and CVE-2016-0196. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
The kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold and 1511 allow local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0171, CVE-2016-0173, and CVE-2016-0196. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
The kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold and 1511 allow local users to obtain sensitive information about kernel-object addresses, and consequently bypass the KASLR protection mechanism, via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability." | 3.3 |
LOW |
||
dxgkrnl.sys in the DirectX Graphics kernel subsystem in the kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold and 1511 allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Microsoft DirectX Graphics Kernel Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Windows Shell in Microsoft Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold and 1511 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site, aka "Windows Shell Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
The kernel in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold and 1511 mishandles symbolic links, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
The kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold and 1511 allow local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0171, CVE-2016-0173, and CVE-2016-0174. | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
dxgkrnl.sys in the DirectX Graphics kernel subsystem in the kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold and 1511 allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Microsoft DirectX Graphics Kernel Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." | 7.8 |
HIGH |
||
Use-after-free vulnerability in the TextField object implementation in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.268 and 19.x and 20.x before 20.0.0.228 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.554 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 20.0.0.204, Adobe AIR SDK before 20.0.0.204, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 20.0.0.204 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted text property, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8048, CVE-2015-8049, CVE-2015-8050, CVE-2015-8055, CVE-2015-8056, CVE-2015-8057, CVE-2015-8058, CVE-2015-8059, CVE-2015-8061, CVE-2015-8062, CVE-2015-8063, CVE-2015-8064, CVE-2015-8065, CVE-2015-8066, CVE-2015-8067, CVE-2015-8068, CVE-2015-8069, CVE-2015-8070, CVE-2015-8071, CVE-2015-8401, CVE-2015-8402, CVE-2015-8403, CVE-2015-8404, CVE-2015-8405, CVE-2015-8406, CVE-2015-8410, CVE-2015-8411, CVE-2015-8412, CVE-2015-8413, CVE-2015-8414, CVE-2015-8420, CVE-2015-8421, CVE-2015-8422, CVE-2015-8423, CVE-2015-8424, CVE-2015-8425, CVE-2015-8426, CVE-2015-8427, CVE-2015-8428, CVE-2015-8429, CVE-2015-8430, CVE-2015-8431, CVE-2015-8432, CVE-2015-8433, CVE-2015-8434, CVE-2015-8435, CVE-2015-8436, CVE-2015-8437, CVE-2015-8441, CVE-2015-8442, CVE-2015-8447, CVE-2015-8448, CVE-2015-8449, CVE-2015-8450, CVE-2015-8452, CVE-2015-8454, CVE-2015-8653, CVE-2015-8655, CVE-2015-8821, and CVE-2015-8822. | 8.8 |
HIGH |
||
Hyper-V in Microsoft Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows 10 allows guest OS users to execute arbitrary code on the host OS via a crafted application, aka "Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." | 9.3 |
CRITICAL |
||
Hyper-V in Microsoft Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows 10 allows guest OS users to obtain sensitive information from host OS memory via a crafted application, aka "Hyper-V Information Disclosure Vulnerability." | 7.1 |
HIGH |
||
Hyper-V in Microsoft Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Windows 10 allows guest OS users to obtain sensitive information from host OS memory via a crafted application, aka "Hyper-V Information Disclosure Vulnerability." | 7.1 |
HIGH |
||
The CAttrArray object implementation in Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 through 11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and memory corruption) via a malformed Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) token sequence in conjunction with modifications to HTML elements, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-6048 and CVE-2015-6049. | 8.1 |
HIGH |